Strategies to Address Increased Demand for Colonoscopy: Guidelines in an Open Endoscopy Practice

被引:49
作者
Baron, Todd H. [1 ]
Kimery, Brenda D. [1 ]
Sorbi, Darius [1 ]
Gorkis, Linda C. [1 ]
Leighton, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Fleischer, David E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Fdn, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1542-3565(03)00317-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Since Medicare approval for reimbursement of screening colonoscopies, the number of colonoscopy requests has increased. Physician resources have often been inadequate to meet the demand. We sought to reduce the demand for colonoscopy in an open endoscopy system by using a guideline-based triage system to eliminate inappropriate procedures and to align the timing of surveillance colonoscopies with recommendations made by national organizations. Methods: This was a cohort study with primary care outpatients. From October 2002 to February 2003, 498 consecutive patients on a waiting list of 2400 awaiting colonoscopy for all indications were triaged and are the focus of the study. Selection of patients for appropriate colonoscopy was based on consensus guidelines developed for institutional use by using established published guidelines for appropriate colonoscopy indications. Results: Of the 498 consecutive patients triaged, 139 (28%) were deemed inappropriate. The most common reason was inappropriate referral for surveillance of colorectal polyps. The percentage of inappropriate referrals by the 3 largest referring specialties (internal medicine, family medicine, and gastroenterology) combined was also 28% with no statistically significant differences between specialties. Conclusions: Most referrals for colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system were appropriate, although about 1 in 4 were not. Use of triage and further education of physicians regarding colonoscopy may optimize colonoscopy utilization.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 182
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia
    Bampton, PA
    Sandford, JJ
    Young, GP
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (04) : 155 - 157
  • [2] Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale
    Berg, AO
    Allan, JD
    Frame, PS
    Homer, CJ
    Johnson, MS
    Klein, JD
    Lieu, TA
    Mulrow, CD
    Orleans, CT
    Peipert, JF
    Pender, NJ
    Siu, AL
    Teutsch, SM
    Westhoff, C
    Woolf, SH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (02) : 129 - 131
  • [3] Bond JH, 2000, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V95, P3053
  • [4] Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations
    Brooker, JC
    Saunders, BP
    Shah, SG
    Thapar, CJ
    Suzuki, N
    Williams, CB
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [5] Effectiveness of open-access endoscopy in routine primary-care practice
    Charles, RJ
    Cooper, GS
    Wong, RCK
    Sivak, MV
    Chak, A
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (02) : 183 - 186
  • [6] Dobson Roger, 2002, BMJ, V324, P1118
  • [7] Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance
    Eisen, GM
    Chutkan, R
    Goldstein, JL
    Petersen, BT
    Ryan, ME
    Sherman, S
    Vargo, J
    Wright, RA
    Young, HS
    Catalano, MF
    Walter, V
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (06) : 777 - 782
  • [8] The impact of colorectal cancer screening on life expectancy
    Inadomi, JM
    Sonnenberg, A
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (05) : 517 - 523
  • [9] Marshall JB, 1996, ARCH INTERN MED, V156, P2065
  • [10] The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system
    Minoli, G
    Meucci, G
    Bortoli, A
    Garripoli, A
    Gullotta, R
    Leo, P
    Pera, A
    Prada, A
    Rocca, F
    Zambelli, A
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (01) : 39 - 44