Comparison of a novel vaginal ring delivering estradiol acetate versus oral estradiol for relief of vasomotor menopausal symptoms

被引:26
作者
Al-Azzawi, F
Buckler, HM
机构
[1] Salford Royal Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Endocrinol, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Gynaecol Res Unit, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
vaginal ring; estrogen replacement therapy; vasomotor symptoms; urogenital atrophy; menopause;
D O I
10.1080/713605372
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare a novel vaginal ring releasing estradiol acetate (Menoring((R)); Galen Holdings) with oral estradiol for relief of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in healthy postmenopausal women. Design This was a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study. Method Women (n = 159) aged < 65 years experiencing greater than or equal to20 hot flushes/night sweats per week received either a vaginal ring releasing estradiol acetate at a rate equivalent to 50 mug/day estradiol plus placebo tablets or oral estradiol 1 mg/day plus a placebo vaginal ring for 24 weeks. For patients with inadequate control of symptoms, the dosage was doubled at 12 weeks. A 24-week, open-label extension of the vaginal ring treatment followed double-blind treatment. Results The frequency of hot flushes/night sweats was significantly reduced (P < 0.001) in both groups at 12 and 24 weeks from baseline, by 84% and 94% for the vaginal ring group and by 73% and 83% for the oral group, respectively. The mean intensity of urogenital symptoms decreased from screening to the end of treatment in both groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar for both groups. No clinically relevant local effects of the vaginal ring were observed. Conclusions The vaginal ring relieved both systemic and urogenital symptoms and was well tolerated and accepted. Overall, the efficacy, safety and acceptability of the vaginal ring were comparable with those of oral estradiol therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 127
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A comparative study of safety and efficacy of continuous low dose oestradiol released from a vaginal ring compared with conjugated equine oestrogen vaginal cream in the treatment of postmenopausal urogenital atrophy [J].
Ayton, RA ;
Darling, GM ;
Murkies, AL ;
Farrell, EA ;
Weisberg, E ;
Selinus, I ;
Fraser, IS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (04) :351-358
[2]  
Bachmann GA, 2000, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V61, P3090
[3]   Continuous low dose estradiol released from a vaginal ring versus estriol vaginal cream for urogenital atrophy [J].
Barentsen, R ;
vandeWeijer, PHM ;
Schram, JHN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1997, 71 (01) :73-80
[4]   CLIMACTERIC SYMPTOMS AMONG WOMEN AGED 60-62 IN LINKOPING, SWEDEN, IN 1986 [J].
BERG, G ;
GOTTQALL, T ;
HAMMAR, M ;
LINDGREN, R .
MATURITAS, 1988, 10 (03) :193-199
[5]  
BUCKLER HM, 2002, MENOPAUSE, V9, P495
[6]   Meta-analysis of estrogen therapy in the management of urogenital atrophy in postmenopausal women: Second report of the hormones and urogenital therapy committee [J].
Cardozo, L ;
Bachmann, G ;
McClish, D ;
Fonda, D ;
Birgerson, L .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (04) :722-727
[7]   Local treatment of urogenital atrophy with an estradiol-releasing vaginal ring: A comparative and a placebo-controlled multicenter study [J].
Casper F. ;
Petri E. ;
Almendral C. ;
Casper F. ;
Distler W. ;
Frick J. ;
Herold J. ;
Huenges P. ;
Hussong R. ;
Methfessel H.D. ;
Müller M. ;
Petri E. ;
Retzke U. ;
Santellani M. ;
Weise W. ;
Wilhelm H. ;
Wortmann M. ;
Zimber P. .
International Urogynecology Journal, 1999, 10 (3) :171-176
[8]   MENOPAUSAL SYMPTOMS IN AUSTRALIAN WOMEN [J].
DENNERSTEIN, L ;
SMITH, AMA ;
MORSE, C ;
BURGER, H ;
GREEN, A ;
HOPPER, J ;
RYAN, M .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1993, 159 (04) :232-236
[9]  
Ettinger B, 1999, AM J MANAG CARE, V5, P779
[10]   THE PREVALENCE OF HOT FLASH AND ASSOCIATED VARIABLES AMONG PERIMENOPAUSAL WOMEN [J].
FELDMAN, BM ;
VODA, A ;
GRONSETH, E .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1985, 8 (03) :261-268