Eligibility and Rate of Treatment for Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Different Criteria

被引:24
作者
Huang, Poyin [1 ]
Khor, Gim-Thean [1 ]
Chen, Chun-Hung [1 ]
Lin, Ruey-Tay [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Ching-Kuan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Masters Program Neurol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiaokang Hosp, Dept Neurol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS; THERAPY; OUTCOMES; EXCLUSION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01006.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
P>Objectives: The rate of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) use for stroke is low among the Chinese-Taiwanese. The study objective was to determine if less restrictive exclusion criteria for rtPA would increase eligibility and the rate of treatment. Methods: This retrospective before-and-after study was conducted from 2006 to 2009. The authors compared stroke patients treated under the old rtPA exclusion criteria (January 2006 to December 2008) with those treated with less restrictive rtPA exclusion criteria (January to December 2009). Rates of eligibility and treatment and reasons for exclusion from rtPA between the two phases were assessed. Results: Of 461 eligible patients during the study period, 333 were evaluated by the old criteria and 128 were evaluated by the less restrictive criteria. Minor or improving stroke was the primary exclusion reason in both groups (194/333, 58% vs. 70/128, 55%). Eligibility for rtPA was increased in the less restrictive criteria (35/127, 27%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 20% to 36%) compared to the old criteria (40/333, 12%, 95% CI = 8.7% to 16%; p = 0.0001). Fewer patients were excluded due to old age in the less restrictive criteria (0/128, 0%) compared to the old criteria (37/333, 11%; p = 0.0001). The rate of consent refusal increased in the less restrictive criteria (27/128, 21%, 95% CI = 14% to 29%) compared to the old criteria (23/333, 6.9%, 95% CI = 4.4% to 10%; p < 0.0001). Rate of rtPA treatment was unchanged between the less restrictive criteria (8/128, 6.3%, 95% CI = 2.7% to 12%) and the old criteria (17/333, 5.1%, 95% CI = 3% to 8%; p = 0.63). Conclusions: Increasing eligibility for rtPA does not increase the rate of treatment, possibly due to the high symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rate among Chinese-Taiwanese, which is a major concern among emergency physicians (EPs), neurologists, and patients. Dealing with perceived safety issues of rtPA is crucial before the rate of treatment can be increased.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany
    Audebert, Heinrich J.
    Schenkel, Johannes
    Heuschmann, Peter U.
    Bogdahn, Ulrich
    Haberl, Roman L.
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2006, 5 (09) : 742 - 748
  • [2] Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility
    Barber, PA
    Zhang, J
    Demchuk, AM
    Hill, MD
    Buchan, AM
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (08) : 1015 - 1020
  • [3] Good outcomes in ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis despite regressing neurological symptoms
    Baumann, CR
    Baumgartner, RW
    Gandjour, J
    von Büdingen, HC
    Siegel, AM
    Georgiadis, D
    [J]. STROKE, 2006, 37 (05) : 1332 - 1333
  • [4] Outcome and severe hemorrhagic complications of intravenous thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in very old (≥80 years) stroke patients
    Berrouschot, J
    Röther, J
    Glahn, J
    Kucinski, T
    Fiehler, J
    Thomalla, G
    [J]. STROKE, 2005, 36 (11) : 2421 - 2425
  • [5] Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for minor strokes: The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Experience
    Broderick, JP
    Brott, T
    DeGraba, T
    Fagan, SC
    Frankel, MR
    Grotta, JC
    Haley, EC
    Hamilton, S
    Kwiatkowski, T
    Levine, SR
    Lewandowski, CA
    Lin, Y
    Libman, R
    Lu, M
    Lyden, P
    Marler, JR
    Morgenstern, L
    Patel, S
    Sanders, C
    Tilley, BC
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (03) : 243 - 252
  • [6] Outcomes of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Patients The Taiwan Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke (TTT-AIS) Study
    Chao, A-Ching
    Hsu, Hung-Yi
    Chung, Chih-Ping
    Liu, Chung-Hsiang
    Chen, Chih-Hung
    Teng, Michael Mu-Huo
    Peng, Giia-Sheun
    Sheng, Wen-Yung
    Hu, Han Hwa
    [J]. STROKE, 2010, 41 (05) : 885 - 890
  • [7] Consent to thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial to practice
    Ciccone, A
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2003, 2 (06) : 375 - 378
  • [8] Reasons for exclusion from thrombolytic therapy following acute ischemic stroke
    Cocho, D
    Belvís, R
    Martí-Fàbregas, J
    Molina-Porcel, L
    Díaz-Manera, J
    Aleu, A
    Pagonabarraga, J
    García-Bargo, D
    Mauri, A
    Martí-Vilalta, JL
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (04) : 719 - 720
  • [9] Influence of the stroke code activation source on the outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients
    de la Ossa, N. Perez
    Sanchez-Ojanguren, J.
    Palomeras, E.
    Millan, M.
    Arenillas, J. F.
    Dorado, L.
    Guerrero, C.
    Abilleira, S.
    Davalos, A.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (15) : 1238 - 1243
  • [10] Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: from trial exclusion criteria to clinical contraindications. An international Delphi study
    Dirks, Maaike
    Niessen, Louis W.
    Koudstaal, Peter J.
    Franke, Cees L.
    van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
    Dippel, Diederik W. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 78 (07) : 685 - 689