Helping students revise disruptive experientially supported ideas about thermodynamics: Computer visualizations and tactile models

被引:68
作者
Clark, D [1 ]
Jorde, D
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Coll Educ, Div Curriculum & Instruct, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Teacher Educ & Sch Dev, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1002/tea.10097
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the impact of an integrated sensory model within a thermal equilibrium visualization. We hypothesized that this intervention would not only help students revise their disruptive experientially supported ideas about why objects feel hot or cold, but also increase their understanding of thermal equilibrium. The analysis synthesizes test data and interviews to measure the impact of this strategy. Results show that students in the experimental tactile group significantly outperform their control group counterparts on posttests and delayed posttests, not only on tactile explanations, but also on thermal equilibrium explanations. Interview transcripts of experimental and control group students corroborate these findings. Discussion addresses improving the tactile model as well as application of the strategy to other science topics. The discussion also considers possible incorporation of actual kinetic or thermal haptic feedback to reinforce the current audio and visual feedback of the visualization. This research builds on the conceptual change literature about the nature and role of students' experientially supported ideas as well as our understanding of curriculum and visualization design to support students in learning about thermo-dynamics, a science topic on which students perform poorly as shown by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) studies. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Albert E., 1978, SCI EDUC, V62, P389, DOI DOI 10.1002/SCE.3730620316
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLASSROOM LESSONS IN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, J RES SCI TEACHING, DOI DOI 10.1002/TEA.3660180506
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NAT SCI ED STAND
[5]  
Appleton K., 1995, RES SCI EDUC, V25, P383
[6]  
Baecker R, 1998, SOFTWARE VISUALIZATION, P369
[7]   Software visualization for debugging [J].
Baecker, R ;
DiGiano, C ;
Marcus, A .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1997, 40 (04) :44-54
[8]   OVERCOMING MISCONCEPTIONS VIA ANALOGICAL REASONING - ABSTRACT TRANSFER VERSUS EXPLANATORY MODEL CONSTRUCTION [J].
BROWN, DE ;
CLEMENT, J .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1989, 18 (04) :237-261
[9]  
BROWN MH, 1998, SOFTWARE VISUALIZATI
[10]  
Bussell L., 2001, Educational Technology, V41, P27