Peasants make their own history, but not just as they please ...

被引:150
作者
McMichael, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
food sovereignty; neoliberalism; peasant movement; dispossession; social reproduction; developmentalism;
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00168.x
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This essay employs contemporary peasant mobilizing discourses and practices to evaluate the terms in which we understand agrarian movements today, through an exercise of historical specification. First, it considers why the terms of the original agrarian question no longer apply to agrarian change today. The shift in the terms corresponds to the movement from the late-nineteenth century and twentieth century, when states were the organizing principle of political-economy, to the twenty-first century, when capital has become the organizing principle. Second, and related, agrarian mobilizations are viewed here as barometers of contemporary political-economic relations. In politicizing the socio-ecological crisis of neoliberalism, they problematize extant categories of political and sociological analysis, re-centring agriculture and food as key to democratic and sustainable relations of social production.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 228
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
ALAVI H, 1987, PEASANTS PEASANT SOC
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS CORNELL U
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW INT
[4]  
[Anonymous], GUARDIAN 0829
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, RELUCTANT REBELS COM
[6]  
[Anonymous], HUNGRY TRADE
[7]  
[Anonymous], MOBILIZATION
[8]  
[Anonymous], NAMING ENEMY ANTICOR
[9]   GLOBAL DEPEASANTIZATION, 1945-1990 [J].
ARAGHI, FA .
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 1995, 36 (02) :337-368
[10]  
Bartra Roger, 1992, CAGE MELANCHOLY