Impact of the case payment reimbursement method on the utilization and costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:28
作者
Lang, HC
Chi, CH
Liu, CM
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Inst Hosp & Hlth Care Adm, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Chen Hsing Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
laparoscopic cholecystectomy; case payment; reimbursement; health policy;
D O I
10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00119-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between adoption of case payment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the growth rate of LC, outcomes of patients undergoing LC, and total healthcare expenditures on cholecystectomy. We used the claims data from Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) to identify patients who underwent LC and open cholecystectomy (OC). Data were available from January 1996 to October 1997 and from January 1998 to October 1999, enabling use to compare data from before and after the introduction of the new case payment system. Results showed that the volume and the proportion of LCs increased after adoption of the new payment method. We did not find a sharp increase in the cholecystectomy rate during the study period. In terms of outcomes, the admission rate for emergencies decreased; the surgery mortality rate decreased, but the readmission rate increased. The average cost and length of hospital stay for LC subjects decreased; however, the total cost of cholecystectomy increased. The impact on LC of the introduction of a case payment method failed to reduce total health expenditures for cholecystectomy. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 206
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, LANGENBECK ARCH CHIR, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01274615
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, NIH CONSENSUS STATEM, V10, P1
[3]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BASS, EB ;
PITT, HA ;
LILLEMOE, KD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (04) :466-471
[4]   A cost-minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy [J].
Berggren, U ;
Zethraeus, N ;
Arvidsson, D ;
Haglund, U ;
Jonsson, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (04) :305-310
[5]  
*BUR NAT HLTH INS, 1999, NAT HLTH INS ANN STA
[6]   PHYSICIAN-MANAGEMENT RELATIONSHIPS AT HCA - A CASE-STUDY [J].
CAMPBELL, P ;
KANE, NM .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 1990, 15 (03) :591-605
[7]   Managed care and medical technology: Implications for cost growth [J].
Chernew, M ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Hirth, RA .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1997, 16 (02) :196-206
[8]  
*COMM PROF HOSP AC, 1991, INT CLASS DIS 9 REV
[9]   LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING [J].
DIEHL, AK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (12) :1469-1470
[10]   FALLING CHOLECYSTECTOMY THRESHOLDS SINCE THE INTRODUCTION OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
ESCARCE, JJ ;
CHEN, W ;
SCHWARTZ, JS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (20) :1581-1585