The impact of AI and robotics on physical, social-emotional and intellectual learning outcomes: An integrated analytical framework

被引:42
作者
Salas-Pilco, Sdenka Zobeida [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Educ Informat Technol, Educ Technol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
COMPUTATIONAL THINKING; DESIGN; PRINCIPLES; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1111/bjet.12984
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This qualitative study examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in learning designs from the perspective of learning sciences. The literature on the topic indicates that there is not enough research on including diverse learning outcomes in the designs for learning. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to understand how AI and robots impact physical, social-emotional and intellectual learning outcomes through the implementation of learning designs that are guided by selected design principles. In this study, the design-based research (DBR) methodology was employed for investigating learning in naturalistic contexts. The intervention was implemented in a primary school in which learners used educational robots. The main findings reveal that the development of an integrated analytical framework, which considers a broader spectrum of human potential, allows for analyzing students' learning outcomes in a more integral, inclusive and balanced way. This, in turn, promotes students' learning by using AI and robots. Another finding reveals that the impact of using AI and robotics on learning designs is reflected in learners' personal trajectories having different pathways and paces. Finally, the lessons learned and the challenges to be overcome are summarized, and recommendations are made for future research for the enhancement of learning experiences that use AI and robotics.
引用
收藏
页码:1808 / 1825
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Anderson L., 2009, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, DESIGNING LEARNING O
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
[4]  
Atmatzidou S., 2016, INT C EDUROBOTICS 20, P58
[5]  
Bae J, 2016, RES HUM R M, P151
[6]  
Balfanz R., 2019, ED NEXT, P68
[7]  
Barab S. A., 2006, CAMBRIDGE HDB LEARNI, P135
[8]   Robotics and STEM learning: students' achievements in assignments according to the P3 Task Taxonomy-practice, problem solving, and projects [J].
Barak, Moshe ;
Assal, Muhammad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2018, 28 (01) :121-144
[9]  
Barnard P. A., 2015, SCH DELUSION DESIGN
[10]  
Beetham Helen, 2020, Rethinking pedagogy for a digital edition