Prediction of positive resection margins in patients with non-palpable breast cancer

被引:31
作者
Barentsz, M. W. [1 ]
Postma, E. L. [2 ]
van Dalen, T. [3 ]
van den Bosch, M. A. A. J. [1 ]
Miao, H. [4 ,5 ]
Gobardhan, P. D. [6 ]
van den Hout, L. E. [1 ]
Pijnappel, R. M. [1 ]
Witkamp, A. J. [2 ]
van Diest, P. J. [7 ]
van Hillegersberg, R. [2 ]
Verkooijen, H. M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Surg, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Dept Surg, NL-3508 TG Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore 117597, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Singapore 117597, Singapore
[6] Amphia Hosp Breda, Dept Surg, NL-4818 CK Breda, Netherlands
[7] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Pathol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Imaging Div, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
EJSO | 2015年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
Breast cancer; Non-palpable lesions; Tumour margins; Prediction model; CONSERVING SURGERY; SURGICAL MARGINS; CONSERVATION SURGERY; LUMPECTOMY MARGINS; WIRE LOCALIZATION; TUMOR SIZE; THERAPY; CARCINOMA; BIOPSY; NOMOGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2014.08.474
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background: In patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer, obtaining tumour free resection margins is important to prevent reexcision and local recurrence. We developed a model to predict positive resection margins in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. Methods: A total of 576 patients with non-palpable invasive breast cancer underwent breast conserving surgery in five hospitals in the Netherlands. A prediction model for positive resection margins was developed using multivariate logistic regression. Calibration and discrimination of the model were assessed and the model was internally validated by bootstrapping. Results: Positive resection margins were present in 69/576 (12%) patients. Factors independently associated with positive resection margins included mammographic microcalcifications (OR 2.14, 1.22-3.77), tumour size (OR 1.75, 1.20-2.56), presence of DCIS (OR 2.61, 1.41-4.82), Bloom and Richardson grade 2/3 (OR 1.82, 1.05-3.14), and caudal location of the lesion (OR 2.4, 1.35-4.27). The model was well calibrated and moderately able to discriminate between patients with positive versus negative resection margins (AUC 0.70, 95% CI, 0.63-0.77, and 0.69 after internal validation). Conclusion: The presented prediction model is moderately able to differentiate between women with high versus low risk of positive margins, and may be useful for surgical planning and preoperative patient counselling. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 112
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2010, A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
[2]
The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer [J].
Aziz, Dalal ;
Rawlinson, Ellen ;
Narod, Steven A. ;
Sun, Ping ;
Lickley, H. Lavina A. ;
McCready, David R. ;
Holloway, Claire M. B. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (04) :331-337
[3]
Radioactive seed localization for non-palpable breast cancer [J].
Barentsz, M. W. ;
van den Bosch, M. A. A. J. ;
Veldhuis, W. B. ;
van Diest, P. J. ;
Pijnappel, R. M. ;
Witkamp, A. J. ;
Verkooijen, H. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (05) :582-588
[4]
Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for excision of non-palpable invasive breast cancer: a hospital-based series and an overview of the literature [J].
Barentsz, M. W. ;
van Dalen, T. ;
Gobardhan, P. D. ;
Bongers, V. ;
Perre, C. I. ;
Pijnappel, R. M. ;
van den Bosch, M. A. A. J. ;
Verkooijen, H. M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 135 (01) :209-219
[5]
Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique [J].
Chagpar, AB ;
Martin, RCG ;
Hagendoorn, LJ ;
Chao, C ;
McMasters, KM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) :399-402
[6]
Comparison of the surgical procedures for breast conserving treatment of early breast cancer in seven EORTC centres [J].
Christiaens, MR ;
Cataliotti, L ;
Fentiman, I ;
Rutgers, E ;
BlichertToft, M ;
DeVries, JE ;
Graversen, HP ;
Vantongelen, K ;
Aerts, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (11) :1866-1875
[7]
Excised and irradiated volumes in relation to the tumor size in breast-conserving therapy [J].
den Hartogh, M. D. ;
van Asselen, B. ;
Monninkhof, E. M. ;
van den Bosch, M. A. A. J. ;
van Vulpen, M. ;
van Diest, P. J. ;
Gilhuijs, K. G. A. ;
Witkamp, A. J. ;
van de Bunt, L. ;
Mali, W. P. T. M. ;
van den Bongard, H. J. G. D. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 129 (03) :857-865
[8]
A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy [J].
Dillon, MF ;
Hill, ADK ;
Quinn, CM ;
McDermott, EW ;
O'Higgins, N .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) :333-339
[9]
Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: Correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins [J].
Dzierzanowski, M ;
Melville, KA ;
Barnes, PJ ;
Macintosh, RF ;
Caines, JS ;
Porter, GA .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 90 (02) :71-76
[10]
PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410