New nomogram for foetal weight estimation based on Hadlock's two-parameter formula

被引:10
作者
Beutler, GM
Kurmanavicius, J
Hoffmann, M
Welzl, E
Huch, R
Bajka, M
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Clin & Policlin Obstet, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] ETH Zentrum, Inst Theoret Comp Sci, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN | 2004年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
ultrasonography; prenatal; birth weight; pregnancy; nomogram; estimated foetal weight;
D O I
10.1055/s-2003-45248
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Aim: To develop and validate a graphical method for ultrasonic foetal weight estimation with predictive qualities comparable to state-of-the-art computational methods. Method: Study data were obtained from 3839 consecutive singleton pregnancies with ultrasound examination within 7 days of delivery. We translated the well established Hadlock 2-parameter formula based on head circumference and femur length into a nomogram. We compared the measured foetal weight with estimations obtained from this new nomogram and three other methods. Results: Measured by the foetal weight percentage error the new nomogram underestimates the foetal weight on average by 2.5 % (9.86) (mean (SD)) with uniform results over the complete birth weight spectrum. By the same measurement the Hadlock 4-parameter formula underestimates the foetal weight by 1.2% (9.3) whereas the Hansmann nomogram overestimates the foetal weight by 14.5% (16.1) The difference between the estimated foetal weight percentage error obtained from the new nomogram and from the Hadlock 2-parameter formula is 0.06 % (0.27) and hence clinically irrelevant. Conclusion: The new nomogram has predictive qualities comparable to state-of-the-art computational methods and is thus not only as reliable but also easy to use in situations when computers are not available. It can be recommended for foetal weight estimation over the whole spectrum of birth weight.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 64
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Outcomes of extremely low-birth-weight infants between 500 and 750 g [J].
Agustines, LA ;
Lin, YG ;
Rumney, PJ ;
Lu, MC ;
Bonebrake, R ;
Asrat, T ;
Nageotte, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1113-1116
[2]   Fetal macrosomia:: risk factors and outcome -: A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500g [J].
Bérard, J ;
Dufour, P ;
Vinatier, D ;
Subtil, D ;
Vanderstichèle, S ;
Monnier, JC ;
Puech, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1998, 77 (01) :51-59
[3]   Estimation of fetal weight before and after amniotomy in the laboring gravid woman [J].
Blann, DW ;
Prien, SD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1117-1120
[4]   ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT [J].
CAMPBELL, S ;
WILKIN, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1975, 82 (09) :689-697
[5]   Limitations of clinical sonographic estimates of birth weight: Experience with 1034 parturients [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Hendrix, NW ;
Magann, EF ;
Morrison, JC ;
Kenney, SP ;
Devoe, LD .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (01) :72-77
[6]  
GUNTERMANN H, 1998, ULTRASCHALL MED S, V19, P32
[7]   SCHOOL-AGE OUTCOMES IN CHILDREN WITH BIRTH WEIGHTS UNDER 750 G [J].
HACK, M ;
TAYLOR, HG ;
KLEIN, N ;
EIBEN, R ;
SCHATSCHNEIDER, C ;
MERCURIMINICH, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (12) :753-759
[8]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
SHARMAN, RS ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) :333-337
[9]   SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT - THE VALUE OF FEMUR LENGTH IN ADDITION TO HEAD AND ABDOMEN MEASUREMENTS [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
CARPENTER, RJ ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 150 (02) :535-540
[10]  
HANSMANN M, 1976, GYNAKOLOGE, V9, P133