Socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies

被引:253
作者
Conway, David I. [1 ]
Petticrew, Mark [2 ]
Marlborough, Helen [3 ]
Bertbiller, Julien [4 ]
Hashibe, Mia [4 ]
Macpherson, Lorna M. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Fac Med, Sch Dent, Dent Publ Hlth Unit, Glasgow G2 3JZ, Lanark, Scotland
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Publ & Environm Hlth Res Unit, London WC1, England
[3] Glasgow Univ Lib, Biomed & Life Sci Fac Support, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Int Agcy Res Canc, F-69372 Lyon, France
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
meta-analysis; oral cancer; SES; socioeconomic status; systematic review;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.23430
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There is uncertainty and limited recognition of the relationship between socioeconomic inequalities and oral cancer. We aimed to quantitatively assess the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and oral cancer incidence risk. A systematic review of case-control studies obtained published and unpublished estimates of the SES risk related to oral cancer. Studies were included which reported odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% CIs of oral cancer with respect to SES, or if the estimates could be calculated or obtained. Meta-analyses were performed on subgroups: SES measure, age, sex, global region, development level, time-period and lifestyle factor adjustments; while sensitivity analyses were conducted based on study methodological issues. Forty-one studies provided 15,344 cases and 33,852 controls which met our inclusion criteria. Compared with individuals who were in high SES strata, the pooled ORs for the risk of developing oral cancer were 1.85 (95%CI 1.60, 2.15; n = 37 studies) for those with low educational attainment; 1.84 (1.47, 2.31; n = 14) for those with low occupational social class; and 2.41 (1.59, 3.65; n = 5) for those with low income. Subgroup analyses showed that low SES was significantly associated with increased oral cancer risk in high and lower income-countries, across the world, and remained when adjusting for potential behavioural confounders. Inequalities persist but are perhaps reducing over recent decades. Oral cancer risk associated with low SES is significant and comparable to lifestyle risk factors. Our results provide evidence to steer health policy which focus on lifestyles factors toward an integrated approach incorporating measures designed to tackle the root causes of disadvantage. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2811 / 2819
页数:9
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Biological ageing - A fundamental, biological link between socio-economic status and health? [J].
Adams, JM ;
White, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 14 (03) :331-334
[2]  
Andreotti Magda, 2006, Cad. Saúde Pública, V22, P543, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2006000300009
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CRDS GUIDANCE THOSE
[4]   A meta-analysis of alcohol drinking and cancer risk [J].
Bagnardi, V ;
Blangiardo, M ;
La Vecchia, C ;
Corrao, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 85 (11) :1700-1705
[6]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[7]  
BERKMAN LF, 1997, SOCIAL INEQUALITIES, P51
[8]   Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology [J].
Blettner, M ;
Sauerbrei, W ;
Schlehofer, B ;
Scheuchenpflug, T ;
Friedenreich, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (01) :1-9
[9]   Changing socioeconomic correlates for cancers of the upper digestive tract [J].
Bosetti, C ;
Franceschi, S ;
Negri, E ;
Talamini, R ;
Tomei, F ;
La Vecchia, C .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (03) :327-330
[10]  
BRESLOW NE, 1980, STAT METHODS CANC RE, V1, P325