Effects of water motion and prey behavior on zooplankton capture by two coral reef fishes

被引:37
作者
Clarke, RD
Buskey, EJ
Marsden, KC
机构
[1] Sarah Lawrence Coll, Dept Biol, Bronxville, NY 10708 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Inst Marine Sci, Port Aransas, TX 78373 USA
[3] Yeshiva Univ Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00227-004-1528-y
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
Water motion is an important factor affecting planktivory on coral reefs. The feeding behavior of two species of tube-dwelling coral reef fish (Chaenopsidae) was studied in still and turbulent water. One species of blenny, Acanthemblemaria spinosa , lives in holes higher above the reef surface and feeds mainly on calanoid copepods, while a second, A. aspera , lives closer to the reef surface, feeds mainly on harpacticoid copepods, and is exposed to less water motion than the first. In the laboratory, these two blenny species were video recorded attacking a calanoid copepod ( Acartia tonsa, evasive prey) and an anostracan branchiopod (nauplii of Artemia sp., passive prey). Whereas A. spinosa attacked with the same vigor in still and turbulent water, A. aspera modulated its attack with a more deliberate strike under still conditions than turbulent conditions. For both fish species combined, mean capture success when feeding on Artemia sp. was 100% in still water and dropped to 78% in turbulent water. In contrast, when feeding on Acartia tonsa, mean capture success was 21% in still water and rose to 56% in turbulent water. We hypothesize that, although turbulence reduces capture success by adding erratic movement to Artemia sp. (passive prey), it increases capture success of Acartia tonsa (evasive prey) by interfering with the hydrodynamic sensing of the approaching predator. These opposite effects of water motion increase the complexity of the predator-prey relationship as water motion varies spatially and temporally on structurally complex coral reefs. Some observations were consistent with A. aspera living in a lower energy benthic boundary layer as compared with A. spinosa: slower initial approach to prey, attack speeds modulated according to water velocity, and lower proportion of approaches that result in strikes in turbulent water.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1155
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Almany GR, 1996, P BIOL SOC WASH, V109, P419
[2]  
Bellwood David R., 2002, P5, DOI 10.1016/B978-012615185-5/50003-7
[3]  
BUSKEY EJ, 1993, B MAR SCI, V53, P29
[4]   Escape behavior of planktonic copepods in response to hydrodynamic disturbances: high speed video analysis [J].
Buskey, EJ ;
Lenz, PH ;
Hartline, DK .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2002, 235 :135-146
[5]   Population shifts in two competing fish species on a degrading coral reef [J].
Clarke, RD .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1996, 137 (1-3) :51-58
[6]  
Clarke RD, 1999, B MAR SCI, V65, P185
[7]  
CLARKE RD, 1989, B MAR SCI, V44, P1174
[8]   ZOOPLANKTON CAPTURE BY A CORAL-REEF FISH - AN ADAPTIVE RESPONSE TO EVASIVE PREY [J].
COUGHLIN, DJ ;
STRICKLER, JR .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 1990, 29 (01) :35-42
[9]   CAPTURE PROBABILITY - ROLE OF ZOOPLANKTER ESCAPE IN SELECTIVE FEEDING OF PLANKTIVOROUS FISH [J].
DRENNER, RW ;
STRICKLER, JR ;
OBRIEN, WJ .
JOURNAL OF THE FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA, 1978, 35 (10) :1370-1373
[10]   Prey capture in long-jawed butterflyfishes (Chaetodontidae): the functional basis of novel feeding habits [J].
Ferry-Graham, LA ;
Wainwright, PC ;
Bellwood, DR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2001, 256 (02) :167-184