Measurement of joint space width in hip osteoarthritis: influence of joint positioning and radiographic procedure

被引:43
作者
Auleley, GR
Duche, A
Drape, JL
Dougados, M
Ravaud, P
机构
[1] Univ Paris V Rene Descartes, Fac Med, CHU Cochin Port Royal, Hop Cochin,Clin Rhumatol, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris V Rene Descartes, Fac Med, CHU Cochin Port Royal, Hop Cochin,Serv Radiol B, F-75014 Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 07, Fac Med Xavier Bichat, Paris, France
[4] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, F-75877 Paris 18, France
关键词
hip; joint space width; osteoarthritis; radiographic measurement; smallest delectable difference;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/40.4.414
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. We assessed the influence of patient positioning and radiographic procedure, and defined a smallest detectable difference (SDD) in hip osteoarthritis (OA). Methods. OA hip patients each had a standardized pelvic radiograph and, 5 min later. a modified pelvic radiograph with the feet internally rotated 5 degrees (part 1 of the study), the X-ray beam centred on the umbilicus (part 2), or another standardized pelvic radiograph (part 3). Results. Corresponding mean differences in joint space width (JSW) measurements (limits of agreement) between views were + 0.03 (- 0.53 to + 0.59), - 0.31 (- 1.15 to + 0.53) and - 0.02 (- 0.48 to + 0.44) mm. The two views differed significantly in mean JSW in part 2 of the study (P = 1.6 x 10(-4)). but not in part I (P = 0.375) and part 3 (P = 0.580). The SDD estimate was 0.46 mm. Conclusions. Modifying the X-ray beam and foot rotation increases variability in JSW measurements. Use of urograms to evaluate radiological progression should be avoided. A change greater than 0.46 mm could define radiological hip OA progression.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 419
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Ahlback S., 1968, Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), V277, P7
[2]   Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society - Results from a workshop [J].
Altman, R ;
Brandt, K ;
Hochberg, M ;
MOskowitz, R ;
Bellamy, N ;
Bloch, DA ;
Buckwalter, J ;
Dougados, M ;
Ehrlich, G ;
Lequesne, M ;
Lohmander, S ;
Murphy, WA ;
RosarioJansen, T ;
Schwartz, B ;
Trippel, S .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1996, 4 (04) :217-243
[3]   RADIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESSION IN OSTEOARTHRITIS [J].
ALTMAN, RD ;
FRIES, JF ;
BLOCH, DA ;
CARSTENS, J ;
COOKE, D ;
GENANT, H ;
GOFTON, P ;
GROTH, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MURPHY, WA ;
SHARP, JT ;
SPITZ, P ;
WILLIAMS, CA ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1987, 30 (11) :1214-1225
[4]  
ALTMAN RD, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P42
[5]   Osteoarthritis of the hip: agreement between joint space width measurements on standing and supine conventional radiographs [J].
Auleley, GR ;
Rousselin, B ;
Ayral, X ;
Edouard-Noel, R ;
Dougados, M ;
Ravaud, P .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1998, 57 (09) :519-523
[6]   COMPARING 2 METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT - A PERSONAL HISTORY [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 24 :S7-S14
[7]  
Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P744
[8]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[9]  
Buckland-Wright JC, 1998, OSTEOARTHRITIS, P459
[10]  
BUCKLANDWRIGHT C, 1998, OSTEOARTHRITIS, P578