Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds .1. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast

被引:84
作者
Eckstein, MP [1 ]
Whiting, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, DEPT RADIOL SCI, LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1364/JOSAA.13.001777
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Several studies have investigated the effect of signal location uncertainty on the detectability of simple visual signals in uncorrelated Gaussian noise with a deterministic background. For this case, human performance in locating a signal in a forced-choice experiment has been successfully predicted for 2-1800 alternative locations with the use of signal detection theory and the usual assumption that the observer's internal response is Gaussian distributed. Gaussian uncorrelated noise is far from realistic medical image noise, which includes not only fluctuations in intensity of quantum origin but also other anatomical objects lying in the x-ray path (structured backgrounds). Our goal is to determine whether signal detection theory with the Gaussian assumption is adequate for the case of structured backgrounds, or whether other more complex models need to be developed to predict human performance as a function of the number of possible signal locations in structured backgrounds. We present experimental data suggesting that an assumed Gaussian internal response accurately predicts the decrease in observer performance as the number of alternative locations is increased. The one exception is a lower-than-predicted performance for the detection of low-contrast signals for two alternative locations. Performance as measured by the index of detectability d' is also found to be linear with signal contrast. Together these findings extend the applicability of signal detection theory with Gaussian internal response functions to the case of complex structured backgrounds. (C) 1996 Optical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1777 / 1787
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
BOCHUD FO, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2436, P156, DOI 10.1117/12.206845
[2]   VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .1. ABILITY TO USE PHASE INFORMATION [J].
BURGESS, A ;
GHANDEHARIAN, H .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (08) :900-905
[4]  
Burgess A. E., 1986, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V626, P208, DOI 10.1117/12.975395
[5]  
BURGESS AE, 1985, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INST, V535, P50, DOI 10.1117/12.947236
[6]   EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN VISUAL SIGNAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
WAGNER, RF ;
JENNINGS, RJ ;
BARLOW, HB .
SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4516) :93-94
[7]   VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .4. OBSERVER INCONSISTENCY [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
COLBORNE, B .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1988, 5 (04) :617-627
[8]   VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .2. SIGNAL-LOCATION IDENTIFICATION [J].
BURGESS, AE ;
GHANDEHARIAN, H .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (08) :906-910
[9]   COMPARISON OF RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC AND FORCED-CHOICE OBSERVER PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT METHODS [J].
BURGESS, AE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (05) :643-655
[10]   QUANTITATIVE RELATION BETWEEN DETECTABILITY AND NOISE POWER [J].
CHESTERS, MS ;
HAY, GA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1983, 28 (10) :1113-1125