Data mining and education

被引:64
作者
Koedinger, Kenneth R. [1 ]
D'Mello, Sidney [2 ]
McLaughlin, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Pardos, Zachary A. [3 ]
Rose, Carolyn P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Human Comp Interact, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Psychol & Comp Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Grad Sch Educ & Sch Informat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Language Technol Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS; LEARNING-FACTORS ANALYSIS; COGNITIVE TASK-ANALYSIS; MODELS; DIALOGUE; EMOTION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1002/wcs.1350
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An emerging field of educational data mining (EDM) is building on and contributing to a wide variety of disciplines through analysis of data coming from various educational technologies. EDM researchers are addressing questions of cognition, metacognition, motivation, affect, language, social discourse, etc. using data from intelligent tutoring systems, massive open online courses, educational games and simulations, and discussion forums. The data include detailed action and timing logs of student interactions in user interfaces such as graded responses to questions or essays, steps in rich problem solving environments, games or simulations, discussion forum posts, or chat dialogs. They might also include external sensors such as eye tracking, facial expression, body movement, etc. We review how EDM has addressed the research questions that surround the psychology of learning with an emphasis on assessment, transfer of learning and model discovery, the role of affect, motivation and metacognition on learning, and analysis of language data and collaborative learning. For example, we discuss (1) how different statistical assessment methods were used in a data mining competition to improve prediction of student responses to intelligent tutor tasks, (2) how better cognitive models can be discovered from data and used to improve instruction, (3) how data-driven models of student affect can be used to focus discussion in a dialog-based tutoring system, and (4) how machine learning techniques applied to discussion data can be used to produce automated agents that support student learning as they collaborate in a chat room or a discussion board. WIREs Cogn Sci 2015, 6:333-353. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1350 For further resources related to this article, please visit the . Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 353
页数:21
相关论文
共 171 条
  • [1] Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs
    Adamson D.
    Dyke G.
    Jang H.
    Rosé C.P.
    [J]. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 1 (92-124): : 92 - 124
  • [2] Agrawal P., 2011, Long papers, P462
  • [3] Ai H., 2010, P 9 INT C LEARN SCI, V1, P976
  • [4] Aleven V, 2000, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1839, P292
  • [5] Aleven V., 2006, INT J ARTIF INTELL E, V16, P101, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_
  • [6] An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor
    Aleven, VAWMM
    Koedinger, KR
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (02) : 147 - 179
  • [7] Anderson J.R., 1993, Rules of the mind
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2013, J. Educ. DataMining
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1990, Unified Theories of Cognition
  • [10] [Anonymous], 02100 CMUHCII