Use of an automated device for alternative site blood glucose monitoring

被引:28
作者
Fineberg, SE
Bergenstal, RM
Bernstein, RM
Laffel, LM
Schwartz, SL
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[2] Reg Endocrinol Associates, Santa Fe, NM USA
[3] Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Reg Endocrinol Associates, Santa Fe, NM USA
[5] Joslin Diabet Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Diabet & Glandular Dis Clin, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.24.7.1217
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the accuracy, comfort, and ease of use of a new automated device for blood glucose monitoring using the arm as an alternative sampling site. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- These studies use an automated hand-held device that applies a small vacuum, lances the skin, transfers blood onto an electrochemical test strip, and measures glucose. Patients who had type 1 or type 2 diabetes and had received no prior training using this device were recruited from five diabetes clinics. Testing was performed by the patients using this device and by trained healthcare professionals. Blood glucose was measured by 354 patients: from the arm using the device, from the finger using a laboratory reference instrument, and from the finger using the device via the secondary test port. Each patient completed a questionnaire rating the level of pain and ease of use of the device. RESULTS - Blood glucose results in samples obtained from the arm with the automated device agreed well with finger stick plasma glucose results using a reference instrument (regression slope 0.98, intercept 0.01 mmol/l [0.1 mg/dl], r = 0.96). Error grid analysis showed that 100% of the measurements fell within zones A and B. In the survey, 60% of the patients reported that arm testing with the automated device was "painless;" another 31% of the patients stated that it was "much less painful," and 6% of patients considered using the device "less painful" than finger-stick testing. In a survey containing 15 questions for rating the ease of use with a scale of 1 to 6, the overall mean rating was 5.5. CONCLUSIONS- The automated device is easy to use and provides accurate glucose results; 97% of the patients found it less painful than finger-stick testing.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1220
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
CARPENTER MB, 1983, HUMAN NEUROANATOMY, P155
[2]   EVALUATING CLINICAL ACCURACY OF SYSTEMS FOR SELF-MONITORING OF BLOOD-GLUCOSE [J].
CLARKE, WL ;
COX, D ;
GONDERFREDERICK, LA ;
CARTER, W ;
POHL, SL .
DIABETES CARE, 1987, 10 (05) :622-628
[3]  
GALLICHAN M, 1999, PRACTICAL DIABETES I, V16, P23
[4]  
Goldstein D., 2000, DIABETES CARE S1, V23, pS80
[5]   TESTS OF GLYCEMIA IN DIABETES [J].
GOLDSTEIN, DE ;
LITTLE, RR ;
LORENZ, RA ;
MALONE, JI ;
NATHAN, D ;
PETERSON, CM .
DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (06) :896-909
[6]  
Haag BL, 1999, DIABETES, V48, pA415
[7]  
*ISO CD, 2001, 15197 ISOCD
[8]  
Lewandrowski KB, 1999, DIABETES, V48, pA387
[9]  
MARRERO DG, 1993, DIABETES CARE, V16, P493
[10]  
*NCCLS, 1994, C30A NCCLS