Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years

被引:62
作者
Cotton, Peter B. [1 ]
Connor, Patrick [1 ]
Rawls, Elaine [1 ]
Romagnuolo, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Ctr Digest Dis, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2007.06.065
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Infection is a known complication of ERCP procedures, and the role of antibiotic prophylaxis is uncertain. Objective: To document the incidence of infection after ERCP while changing the policy for antibiotic prophylaxis. Design: Retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively on infection complications, with progressive reduction in the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Setting: Single-center university referral hospital. Patients: A total of 11,484 ERCP procedures were documented prospectively over a period of 11 years. Interventions: After baseline assessment, the use of prophylactic antibiotics was sequentially reduced and simplified in 3 phases. Main Outcome Measurements: Incidence of infection, categorized by severity. Results: The infection rate was low overall and decreased significantly with time, from 0.48% to 0.25%, despite a marked reduction in the proportion of patients given antibiotics (from 95% to 25%). Multivariate analysis also showed that the only category of patients at increased risk for infection (despite antibiotics) was the subgroup undergoing interventions for biliary problems after liver transplantation. Limitations: A lack of routine follow-up may mean that some delayed infectious complications were not recorded. The low risk of infection in this series may reflect the high technical success rate for relief of biliary Obstruction; thus, our current minimalist antibiotic policy may not be generalizable to community practice. Conclusions: Infectious complications of ERCP can be kept to a minimum with a limited use of prophylactic antibiotics.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 475
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   PREVENTION OF SEPSIS FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY [J].
ALVEYN, CG ;
ROBERTSON, DAF ;
WRIGHT, R ;
LOWES, JA ;
TILLOTSON, G .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1991, 19 :65-70
[2]  
BILBAO MK, 1976, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V70, P314
[3]   ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS FOR INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS AFTER THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY [J].
BYL, B ;
DEVIERE, J ;
STRUELENS, MJ ;
ROUCLOUX, I ;
DECONINCK, A ;
THYS, JP ;
CREMER, M .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 20 (05) :1236-1240
[4]  
Ceyssens C, 2006, ACTA CLIN BELG, V61, P10
[5]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[6]   CLOGGING OF BILIARY ENDOPROSTHESES - A MORPHOLOGICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL STUDY [J].
DOWIDAR, N ;
KOLMOS, HJ ;
LYON, H ;
MATZEN, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 26 (11) :1137-1144
[7]  
Freeman Martin L, 2002, Rev Gastroenterol Disord, V2, P147
[8]   Meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [J].
Harris, A ;
Chan, ACH ;
Torres-Viera, C ;
Hammett, R ;
Carr-Locke, D .
ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 31 (09) :718-724
[9]   Guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy [J].
Hirota, WK ;
Petersen, K ;
Baron, TH ;
Goldstein, JL ;
Jacobson, BC ;
Leighton, JA ;
Mallery, JS ;
Waring, JP ;
Fanelli, RD ;
Wheeler-Harbough, J ;
Faigel, DO .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (04) :475-482
[10]   Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study [J].
Loperfido, S ;
Angelini, G ;
Benedetti, G ;
Chilovi, F ;
Costan, F ;
De Berardinis, F ;
De Bernardin, M ;
Ederle, A ;
Fina, P ;
Fratton, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 48 (01) :1-10