Institutionalizing pain management: The post-operative pain management quality improvement project

被引:56
作者
Dahl, JL
Gordon, D
Ward, S
Skemp, M
Wochos, S
Schurr, M
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Med Sci Ctr 4735, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Hosp & Clin, Madison, WI 53792 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Nursing, Madison, WI USA
关键词
quality improvement; outcomes; postoperative pain;
D O I
10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00640-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical practice and quality improvement (QI) guidelines for acute postoperative pain management have been developed to address the well-documented problem of undertreatment of postoperative pain. The Post-Operative Pain Management Quality Improvement Project (the POP Project) was initiated to determine whether an intervention designed to support hospitals in the development of QI efforts would lead to improvements in structures, processes, and outcomes consistent with recommended guidelines. A nationwide sample of 233 hospitals joined the project. The intervention consisted of written resource materials accompanied by support services that included an e-mail list server, a resource Web page, and assistance from POP Project staff via telephone. Data regarding critical structures, processes (practice patterns), and patient outcomes were collected at baseline before the intervention began and at follow-up 12 to18 months later. Results showed a statistically significant increase from baseline (45%) to follow-up (72%) in the presence of structural elements that are critical to improving pain management. There were statistically significant improvements in practices including documented use of pain rating scales, decreased use of intramuscular opioids, and increased use of nonpharmacologic strategies. Patient survey data showed no change in pain outcomes. Evaluation data showed that 70% of hospitals were very or extremely satisfied with their participation in the POP Project and 90% of them planned to continue efforts to improve pain management after the POP Project ended. Further research is needed to determine how to translate the excellent results obtained for structure and process into meaningful outcomes for patients. (C) 2003 by the American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 371
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   THE PREVALENCE OF PAIN IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS AND RESOLUTION OVER 6 MONTHS [J].
ABBOTT, FV ;
GRAYDONALD, K ;
SEWITCH, MJ ;
JOHNSTON, CC ;
EDGAR, L ;
JEANS, ME .
PAIN, 1992, 50 (01) :15-28
[2]  
*AG HEALTH POL RES, 1995, AHCPR PUBL
[3]  
*AG HEALTH POL RES, 1994, AHCPR PUBL
[4]  
*AG HEALTH POL RES, 1992, AHCPR PUBL
[5]   Implementing national standards for cancer pain management: Program model and evaluation [J].
Bookbinder, M ;
Coyle, N ;
Kiss, M ;
Goldstein, ML ;
Holritz, K ;
Thaler, H ;
Gianella, A ;
Derby, S ;
Brown, M ;
Racolin, A ;
Ho, MN ;
Portenoy, RK .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1996, 12 (06) :334-347
[6]   A qualitative study of increasing β-blocker use after myocardial infarction -: Why do some hospitals succeed? [J].
Bradley, EH ;
Holmboe, ES ;
Mattera, JA ;
Roumanis, SA ;
Radford, MJ ;
Krumholz, HM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20) :2604-2611
[7]  
Bryant R A, 2001, Ostomy Wound Manage, V47, P26
[8]   Preempting the memory of pain [J].
Carr, DB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (14) :1114-1115
[9]   Improving the quality of care .3. [J].
Chassin, MR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (14) :1060-1063
[10]  
CLELLAND C, 1992, HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT, P362