What they see is what we get - Response options for web surveys

被引:90
作者
Couper, MP [1 ]
Tourangeau, R
Conrad, FG
Crawford, SD
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Survey Res Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Joint Program Survey Methodol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
web surveys; drop boxes; radio buttons; instrument design; response order effects;
D O I
10.1177/0894439303256555
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Several alternative response formats are available to the web survey designer, but the choice of format is often made with little consideration of measurement error. The authors experimentally explore three common response formats used in web surveys: a series of radio buttons, a drop box with none of the options initially displayed until the respondent clicks on the box, and a scrollable drop box with some of the options initially visible, requiring the respondent to scroll to see the remainder of the options. The authors reversed the order of the response options for half the sample. The authors find evidence of response order effects but stronger evidence that visible response options are endorsed more frequently, suggesting that visibility may be a more powerful effect than primacy in web surveys. The results suggest that the response format used in web surveys does affect the choices made by respondents.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 127
页数:17
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Statistical design for research
[2]   TASK CONDITIONS, RESPONSE FORMULATION PROCESSES, AND RESPONSE ACCURACY FOR BEHAVIORAL FREQUENCY QUESTIONS IN SURVEYS [J].
BURTON, S ;
BLAIR, E .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1991, 55 (01) :50-79
[3]  
Chen Mon Chu, 2001, CHI 01 HUM FACT COMP, P281, DOI [10.1145/634067.634234, DOI 10.1145/634067.634234]
[4]  
Couper M.P., 2001, HDB INTERVIEW RES CO, P557, DOI 0-7619-1951-1
[5]   Web survey design and administration [J].
Couper, MP ;
Traugott, MW ;
Lamias, MJ .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2001, 65 (02) :230-253
[6]   Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments [J].
Couper, MP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2000, 18 (04) :384-396
[7]   An evaluation of the effect of response formats on data quality in web surveys [J].
Heerwegh, D ;
Loosveldt, G .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2002, 20 (04) :471-484
[8]  
Hennessy D. G., 2002, THESIS U WOLLONGONG
[9]  
Jenkins C. R., 1995, SURVEY MEASUREMENT P, P165
[10]   AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENT [J].
KROSNICK, JA ;
ALWIN, DF .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1987, 51 (02) :201-219