Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes

被引:143
作者
Mohammed, S
Ringseis, E
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.2000.2943
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study contributes to the new and growing body of research on shared cognition by examining how individuals entering a group decision-making context with different perspectives of the issues to be discussed arrive at cognitive consensus. Cognitive consensus refers to similarity among group members regarding how key matters are conceptualized and was operationalized as shared assumptions underlying decision issues in the present research. Utilizing 37 student groups participating in a multi-issue decision-making exercise, the study investigated antecedents and correlates of cognitive consensus. Results revealed that unanimity decision rule groups achieved more cognitive consensus than majority rule groups. In addition, group members inquiring concerning the reasons underlying others' decision preferences, accepting others' viewpoints as legitimate, and incorporating others' perspectives into their own interpretations of the issues was positively related to arriving at a greater degree of cognitive consensus. Cognitive consensus also positively influenced expectations regarding decision implementation and satisfaction. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 335
页数:26
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   MEASURES OF INEQUALITY [J].
ALLISON, PD .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 43 (06) :865-880
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL GROUP INFLUE
[3]   TO CENTRALIZE OR NOT TO CENTRALIZE - THE EFFECTS OF UNCERTAINTY AND THREAT ON GROUP-STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE [J].
ARGOTE, L ;
TURNER, ME ;
FICHMAN, M .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1989, 43 (01) :58-74
[4]  
Argyle M., 1991, Cooperation, the basis of sociability
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]  
BEGGS RJ, 1989, TEACHING NOTE TOWER
[7]   5 YEARS OF GROUPS RESEARCH - WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED AND WHAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED [J].
BETTENHAUSEN, KL .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (02) :345-381
[8]  
BILLINGS RS, 1994, ANN M INT SOC POL PS
[9]   SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY AND ANALYSIS OF INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT [J].
BREHMER, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1976, 83 (06) :985-1003
[10]   CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS - EFFECTS OF SOCIAL IDENTITY, GROUP-SIZE, AND DECISION FRAMING [J].
BREWER, MB ;
KRAMER, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (03) :543-549