Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category, Lymph Node Metastases, and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:428
作者
Al-Sukhni, Eisar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Milot, Laurent [2 ,4 ]
Fruitman, Mark [5 ]
Beyene, Joseph [6 ]
Victor, J. Charles [7 ]
Schmocker, Selina [1 ,3 ]
Brown, Gina [8 ]
McLeod, Robin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kennedy, Erin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Zane Cohen Ctr Digest Dis, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[5] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sutton, Surrey, England
关键词
HIGH-RESOLUTION MRI; PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT; CARCINOMA; INVASION; USPIO;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used for rectal cancer staging. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of phased array MRI for T category (T1-2 vs. T3-4), lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in primary rectal cancer. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using combinations of keywords relating to rectal cancer and MRI. Reference lists of included articles were also searched by hand. Inclusion criteria were: (1) original article published January 2000-March 2011, (2) use of phased array coil MRI, (3) histopathology used as reference standard, and (4) raw data available to create 2 x 2 contingency tables. Patients who underwent preoperative long-course radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were excluded. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were estimated for each outcome using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics and bivariate random effects modeling. Twenty-one studies were included in the analysis. There was notable heterogeneity among studies. MRI specificity was significantly higher for CRM involvement [94%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 88-97] than for T category (75%, 95% CI 68-80) and lymph nodes (71%, 95% CI 59-81). There was no significant difference in sensitivity between the three elements as a result of wide overlapping CIs. Diagnostic odds ratio was significantly higher for CRM (56.1, 95% CI 15.3-205.8) than for lymph nodes (8.3, 95% CI 4.6-14.7) but did not differ significantly from T category (20.4, 95% CI 11.1-37.3). MRI has good accuracy for both CRM and T category and should be considered for preoperative rectal cancer staging. In contrast, lymph node assessment is poor on MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:2212 / 2223
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Accuracy of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer [J].
Akasu, Takayuki ;
Iinuma, Gen ;
Takawa, Masashi ;
Yamamoto, Seiichiro ;
Muramatsu, Yukio ;
Moriyama, Noriyuki .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (10) :2787-2794
[2]   International Preoperative Rectal Cancer Management: Staging, Neoadjuvant Treatment, and Impact of Multidisciplinary Teams [J].
Augestad, Knut M. ;
Lindsetmo, Rolv-Ole ;
Stulberg, Jonah ;
Reynolds, Harry ;
Senagore, Anthony ;
Champagne, Brad ;
Heriot, Alexander G. ;
Leblanc, Fabien ;
Delaney, Conor P. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (11) :2689-2700
[3]   Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery [J].
Beets-Tan, RGH ;
Beets, GL ;
Vliegen, RFA ;
Kessels, AGH ;
Van Boven, H ;
De Bruine, A ;
von Meyenfeldt, MF ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
van Engelshoven, JMA .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) :497-504
[4]   Rectal cancer: Local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging - A meta-analysis [J].
Bipat, S ;
Glas, AS ;
Slors, FJM ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Stoker, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :773-783
[5]   Can magnetic resonance imaging predict circumferential margins and TNM stage in rectal cancer? [J].
Branagan, G ;
Chave, H ;
Fuller, C ;
McGee, S ;
Finnis, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (08) :1317-1322
[6]   Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study [J].
Brown, G. ;
Daniels, I. R. ;
Heald, R. J. ;
Quirke, P. ;
Blomqvist, L. ;
Sebag-Montefiore, D. ;
Moran, B. J. ;
Holm, T. ;
Strassbourg, J. ;
Peppercorn, P. D. ;
Fisher, S. E. ;
Mason, B. .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7572) :779-782
[7]   Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison [J].
Brown, G ;
Richards, CJ ;
Bourne, MW ;
Newcombe, RG ;
Radcliffe, AG ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Williams, GT .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (02) :371-377
[8]   MRI identified prognostic features of tumors in distal sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and upper rectum: Treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy [J].
Burton, Sarah ;
Brown, Gina ;
Daniels, Ian ;
Norman, Andy ;
Swift, Ian ;
Abulafi, Muti ;
Wotherspoon, Andy ;
Tait, Diana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (02) :445-451
[9]   Magnetic resonance imaging cannot predict histological tumour involvement of a circumferential surgical margin in rectal cancer [J].
Dent, O. F. ;
Chapuis, P. H. ;
Haboubi, N. ;
Bokey, L. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (09) :974-981
[10]   Location of involved mesorectal and extramesorectal lymph nodes in patients with primary rectal cancer: Preoperative assessment with MR imaging [J].
Engelen, S. M. E. ;
Beets-Tan, R. G. H. ;
Lahaye, M. J. ;
Kessels, A. G. H. ;
Beets, G. L. .
EJSO, 2008, 34 (07) :776-781