Seeking the Pareto front for multiobjective spatial optimization problems

被引:44
作者
Huang, B. [1 ]
Fery, P. [2 ]
Xue, L. [3 ]
Wang, Y. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog & Resource Management, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil Engn, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[3] Peking Univ, Inst Remote Sensing & Geog Informat Syst, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
multiobjective optimization; GIS; pareto-front; multiobjective routing;
D O I
10.1080/13658810701492365
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Spatial optimization problems, such as route selection, usually involve multiple, conflicting objectives relevant to locations. An ideal approach to solving such multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) is to find an evenly distributed set of Pareto-optimal alternatives, which is capable of representing the possible trade-off among different objectives. However, these MOPs are commonly solved by combining the multiple objectives into a parametric scalar objective, in the form of a weighted sum function. It has been found that this method fails to produce a set of well spread solutions by disregarding the concave part of the Pareto front. In order to overcome this ill-behaved nature, a novel adaptive approach has been proposed in this paper. This approach seeks to provide an unbiased approximation of the Pareto front by tuning the search direction in the objective space according to the largest unexplored region until a set of well-distributed solutions is reached. To validate the proposed methodology, a case study on multiobjective routing has been performed using the Singapore road network with the support of GIS. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the approach.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 526
页数:20
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Andersson J., 2000, SURVEY MULTIOBJECTIV
[2]  
Benayoun J. T. R., 1971, MATH PROGRAM, V1, P366, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01584098
[3]  
Chakhar S., 2003, J. Geogr. Inf. Decis. Anal, V7, P47, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CHB.2011.11.013
[4]   Quality utility - A compromise programming approach to robust design [J].
Chen, W ;
Wiecek, MM ;
Zhang, J .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1999, 121 (02) :179-187
[5]   Geographical Information Systems and Location Science [J].
Church, RL .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (06) :541-562
[6]   An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques [J].
Coello, CAC .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2000, 32 (02) :109-143
[7]  
Coles S., 2001, An Introduction to Statistical Modelling of Extreme Values
[8]  
CURRENT JR, 1986, EUR J OPER RES, V26, P186
[9]   Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1998, 8 (03) :631-657
[10]   A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems [J].
Das, I ;
Dennis, JE .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) :63-69