A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope

被引:103
作者
Sivakumaran, S [1 ]
Krahn, AD [1 ]
Klein, GJ [1 ]
Finan, J [1 ]
Yee, R [1 ]
Renner, S [1 ]
Skanes, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Cardiol, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00233-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The initial management of syncope or presyncope typically involves short-term cardiac monitoring using a Holter monitor. A loop recorder is used to extend the period of monitoring to increase the probability of obtaining a symptom-rhythm correlation. Loop recorders and Holler monitors are both used commonly, but their utility has not been compared prospectively. METHODS: Patients with syncope or presyncope referred for a Holler monitor or a loop recorder were assigned randomly to receive either a 48-hour Holter monitor or a loop recorder for 1 month as an initial diagnostic strategy. If the initial strategy was unsuccessful, patients were offered crossover to the alternate strategy. RESULTS: One hundred patients (mean [+/-SD] age, 56 +/- 20 years; 44 women) with syncope (n = 21), presyncope (n = 29), or both (n = 50) were enrolled. Of the 49 patients assigned randomly to an external loop recorder first, 31 (63%) had an arrhythmia identified or excluded, versus 12 (24%) of 51 patients assigned to a Holter monitor initially (P <0.0001). Arrhythmia was identified as a cause of syncope in I patient with a loop recorder, compared with no patients with a Holter monitor (P = 0.31). Of the 29 patients with negative results with Holler monitoring who went on to receive a loop recorder, 13 (45%) had arrhythmia excluded, compared with none of the 4 patients who crossed over to receive a Holter monitor. The overall probability of obtaining a symptom-rhythm correlation was 56% (44/78) for loop recorders versus 22% (12/55) for Holler monitors (P <0.0001). Despite patient education and test transmissions, 13 (23%) of 57 patients who had recurrence of their symptoms failed to activate their loop recorder properly. CONCLUSION: Loop recorders have a much higher diagnostic yield for patients with syncope or presyncope as compared with Holler monitors. The utility of loop recorders is limited by some patients' inability to operate them correctly. (C) 2003 by Excerpta Medica Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE DURATION OF HOLTER MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH SYNCOPE - IS 24 HOURS ENOUGH [J].
BASS, EB ;
CURTISS, EI ;
ARENA, VC ;
HANUSA, BH ;
CECCHETTI, A ;
KARPF, M ;
KAPOOR, WN .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 150 (05) :1073-1078
[2]   SUPERIORITY OF 24-HOUR OUTPATIENT MONITORING OVER MULTISTAGE EXERCISE TESTING FOR THE EVALUATION OF SYNCOPE [J].
BOUDOULAS, H ;
SCHAAL, SF ;
LEWIS, RP ;
ROBINSON, JL .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 1979, 12 (01) :103-108
[3]  
BROWN AP, 1987, BRIT HEART J, V58, P251
[4]   ARRHYTHMIAS DETECTED BY AMBULATORY MONITORING - LACK OF CORRELATION WITH SYMPTOMS OF DIZZINESS AND SYNCOPE [J].
CLARK, PI ;
GLASSER, SP ;
SPOTO, E .
CHEST, 1980, 77 (06) :722-725
[5]   CARDIAC LOOP ECG RECORDING - A NEW NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSTIC-TEST IN RECURRENT SYNCOPE [J].
CUMBEE, SR ;
PRYOR, RE ;
LINZER, M .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 83 (01) :39-43
[6]   DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF 24-HOUR ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC MONITORING FOR SYNCOPE [J].
GIBSON, TC ;
HEITZMAN, MR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 53 (08) :1013-1017
[7]   IMPORTANCE OF HOLTER MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH PERIODIC CEREBRAL SYMPTOMS [J].
JONAS, S ;
KLEIN, I ;
DIMANT, J .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1977, 1 (05) :470-474
[8]  
KALA R, 1982, ACTA MED SCAND, P13
[9]   PROLONGED ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH SYNCOPE - IMPORTANCE OF FREQUENT OR REPETITIVE VENTRICULAR ECTOPY [J].
KAPOOR, WN ;
CHA, R ;
PETERSON, JR ;
WIEAND, HS ;
KARPF, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 82 (01) :20-28
[10]   EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT WITH SYNCOPE [J].
KAPOOR, WN .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (18) :2553-2560