Coping with corruption in foreign markets

被引:200
作者
Doh, JP [1 ]
Rodriguez, P
Uhlenbruck, K
Collins, J
Eden, L
机构
[1] Villanova Univ, Ctr Responsible Leadership & Governance, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Darden Grad Sch Business, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
来源
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE | 2003年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AME.2003.10954775
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Government corruption is a pervasive element of the international business environment and has damaging effects on governments, firms, and the broader society in which it takes place. Recently publicized scandals in Russia, China, Pakistan, Lesotho, South Africa, Costa Rica, Egypt, and elsewhere underscore the extent of corruption globally, especially in the developing world. Yet, the impact of government corruption on foreign investment has received limited attention. In this article, we examine how multinational firms respond to corruption when investing in foreign markets, especially developing countries. The article begins with a discussion of the direct and indirect costs of corruption to business and provides illustrations of corruption's impact on firms that invest in foreign markets. We employ a framework that incorporates two basic dimensions of government corruption pervasiveness and arbitrariness. We then propose five broad strategies that multinationals should consider in responding to corruption and give examples of organizations that use these approaches. Corruption involves costs that firms investing abroad are likely to misjudge or ignore. A clear understanding of corruption's nature creates value for decision makers and allows for a strategic analysis of responses to corruption pressures.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 127
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy [J].
Ahlstrom, D ;
Bruton, GD .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2001, 15 (04) :72-83
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1971, Sovereignty at Bay: The Spread of U.S. Enterprises
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ECONOMIST 0725
[4]  
[Anonymous], WALL STREET J 0129
[5]   EQUITY JOINT VENTURES AND THE THEORY OF THE MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISE [J].
BEAMISH, PW ;
BANKS, JC .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1987, 18 (02) :1-16
[6]   INTERNATIONAL-BUSINESS POLITICAL-BEHAVIOR - NEW THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS [J].
BODDEWYN, JJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (01) :119-143
[7]   Investment and institutional uncertainty: A comparative study of different uncertainty measures [J].
Brunetti, A ;
Weder, B .
WELTWIRTSCHAFTLICHES ARCHIV-REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 1998, 134 (03) :513-533
[8]  
*BUS SOC RESP, 2002, CORR BRIB WHIT PAP
[9]  
Campos JE, 1999, WORLD DEV, V27, P1059
[10]  
Cassidy W.B., 2002, TRAFFIC WORLD, V266, P8