The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml: A randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy

被引:48
作者
Emiliozzi, P [1 ]
Scarpone, P
DePaula, F
Pizzo, M
Federico, G
Pansadoro, A
Martini, M
Pansadoro, V
机构
[1] San Giovanni Hosp, Rome, Italy
[2] Vincenzo Pansadoro Fdn, Rome, Italy
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; biopsy; ultrasonography;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000099824.73886.f3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The prostate cancer detection rate in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) increases with extended needle biopsy protocols. Transperineal biopsy under transrectal ultrasound guidance is rarely reported, although notable cancer diagnoses are obtained with this technique. We describe the results of 6 and 12 core transperineal biopsy. Materials and Methods: A total of 214 patients with PSA greater than 4.0 ng/ml were prospectively randomized to undergo 6 or 12 core transperineal biopsy. Each group of 107 patients was comparable in terms of clinical characteristics. The procedure was performed on an outpatient basis using local anesthesia. Specimens were obtained with a fan technique with 2 puncture sites slightly above the rectum (1 per lobe) under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Cores were taken from all peripheral areas, including the far lateral aspect of the prostate. Results: The overall cancer detection rate was 38% and 51% for 6 and 12 core biopsy, respectively. In patients with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml the cancer detection rate was 30% and 49% for 6 and 12 core biopsy, respectively. Conclusions: The 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy is superior to 6 core biopsy. The technique provides optimal prostate cancer diagnosis. About half of the patients with PSA greater than 4.0 ng/ml and a slightly lower percent with PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml have prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 199
页数:3
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy
    Babaian, RJ
    Toi, A
    Kamoi, K
    Troncoso, P
    Sweet, J
    Evans, R
    Johnston, D
    Chen, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (01) : 152 - 157
  • [2] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY AND SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES FOR EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA
    BAZINET, M
    MESHREF, AW
    TRUDEL, C
    ARONSON, S
    PELOQUIN, F
    NACHABE, M
    BEGIN, LR
    ELHILALI, MM
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [3] SCREENING FOR PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    BRAWER, MK
    CHETNER, MP
    BEATIE, J
    BUCHNER, DM
    VESSELLA, RL
    LANGE, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) : 841 - 845
  • [4] Comparative study of two different TRUS-guided sextant biopsy techniques in detecting prostate cancer in one biopsy session
    Brössner, C
    Madersbacher, S
    Bayer, G
    Pycha, A
    Klingler, HC
    Maier, U
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [5] PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION IN A CLINICAL UROLOGICAL PRACTICE BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    COONER, WH
    MOSLEY, BR
    RUTHERFORD, CL
    BEARD, JH
    POND, HS
    TERRY, WJ
    IGEL, TC
    KIDD, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (06) : 1146 - 1154
  • [6] Gleason scores from prostate biopsies obtained with 18-gauge biopsy needles poorly predict Gleason scores of radical prostatectomy specimens
    Djavan, B
    Kadesky, K
    Klopukh, B
    Marberger, M
    Roehrborn, CG
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1998, 33 (03) : 261 - 270
  • [7] Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: When should we stop?
    Djavan, B
    Ravery, V
    Zlotta, A
    Dobronski, P
    Dobrovits, M
    Fakhari, M
    Seitz, C
    Susani, M
    Borkowski, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Schulman, CC
    Marberger, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) : 1679 - 1683
  • [8] NORMAL RANGE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN VERSUS AGE-SPECIFIC PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SCREENING PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA
    ELGALLEY, RES
    PETROS, JA
    SANDERS, WH
    KEANE, TE
    GALLOWAY, NTM
    COONER, WH
    GRAHAM, SD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (02) : 200 - 204
  • [9] Best approach for prostate cancer detection: A prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy
    Emiliozzi, P
    Corsetti, A
    Tassi, B
    Federico, G
    Martini, M
    Pansadoro, V
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (05) : 961 - 966
  • [10] The value of a single biopsy with 12 transperineal cores for detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen
    Emiliozzi, P
    Longhi, S
    Scarpone, P
    Pansadoro, A
    DePaula, F
    Pansadoro, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03) : 845 - 850