A comparative study on energetic, exergetic and environmental performance assessments of novel M-Cycle based air coolers for buildings

被引:56
作者
Caliskan, Hakan [2 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Inst Technol, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Ege Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Air cooler; Building; Environment; Energy; Exergy; Efficiency; Greenhouse gases; Maisotsenko cycle; Sustainability; EVAPORATIVE COOLING SYSTEM; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2011.11.007
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, three various novel air coolers based on M-Cycle are evaluated using energy and exergy analyses based efficiency assessments along with environmental impact and sustainability parameters. The M-Cycle systems are considered to cool a building room air while their inlet air parameters are same, but outlet cooled air parameters are different. Systems I and III draw electricity directly taken from an electric grid in the building while System II, which is stand alone system, produces and draws electricity from its solar PV panels. In the energy analysis, wet bulb effectiveness, cooling capacity. Coefficient of Performance (energetic COP) and Primary Energy Ratio (PER) are found. In the exergy analysis, exergy input and output rates, exergy loss rate, exergy destruction rate, Exergetic Coefficient of Performance (COPex), Primary Exergy Ratio (PExR) and exergy efficiency are obtained for six different dead state temperatures changing between 10 degrees C and 35 degrees C. Also, sustainability assessments of the systems are obtained using sustainability index (SI) tool for these various dead state temperatures. Finally, environmental assessments of the systems are calculated from their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (gCO(2)/kW h) due to their electricity consumptions. Maximum exergy efficiencies and sustainability assessments are found to be 35.13% and 1.5415 for System III and 34.94% and 1.5372 for System II, respectively. GHG emissions of the systems are calculated to be 2119.68 gCO(2)/day, 153.6 gCO(2)/day and 3840 gCO(2)/day for Systems I, II and III respectively. So, System II becomes a good choose to prevent the global warming and to attain sustainable future. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 79
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Air conditioner, AIR CONDITIONER
[2]   A survey of energy efficient strategies for effective air conditioning [J].
Al-Rabghi, OM ;
Akyurt, MM .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (11-12) :1643-1654
[3]  
Alsema EA, 2000, PROG PHOTOVOLTAICS, V8, P17, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(200001/02)8:1<17::AID-PIP295>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-C
[5]  
[Anonymous], Comparative life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of a mid-size BEV and ICE vehicle-Charts-Data & Statistics
[6]  
ASHRAE, ASHRAE TECHN COMM 2
[7]   Exergetic and sustainability performance comparison of novel and conventional air cooling systems for building applications [J].
Caliskan, Hakan ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (06) :1461-1472
[8]   Thermodynamic performance assessment of a novel air cooling cycle: Maisotsenko cycle [J].
Caliskan, Hakan ;
Hepbasli, Arif ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Maisotsenko, Valeriy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DU FROID, 2011, 34 (04) :980-990
[9]   A new approach to analysis and optimization of evaporative cooling system I: Theory [J].
Chen, Qun ;
Yang, Kangding ;
Wang, Moran ;
Pan, Ning ;
Guo, Zeng-Yuan .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (06) :2448-2454
[10]  
Coolerado Inc, VID 3 COOL SOL POW A