Surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: an analysis of the literature

被引:141
作者
Bartels, RHMA
Menovsky, T
Van Overbeeke, JJ
Verhagen, WIM
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Neurol & Clin Neurophysiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
ulnar nerve; cubital tunnel syndrome; elbow; surgical approach; review;
D O I
10.3171/jns.1998.89.5.0722
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Surgical treatment for cubital ulnar nerve compresson includes medial epicondylectomy, simple decompression, or anterior transposition (subcutaneous. intramuscular. or submuscular). There is a dearth of prospective randomized studies on which to base guidelines for choosing one operative treatment over another. The authors review the literature on this subject and present their findings. Methods. The authors reviewed the literature from January 1970 to July 1997. Two authors decided independently whether an article should be included for review based on previously formulated inclusion and exclusion criteria. In addition to demographic information, data concerning preoperative status and outcome were extracted. For statistical analyses chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests win performed. Irrespective of their preoperative status, patients with simple decompression had the best outcome. whereas those with anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition had the worst. If outcome was related to the patient's preoperative status, a significant difference was not found among the various groups for those patients with a preoperative McGowan Grade 2. However, for those with McGowan Grade 3 (severe) symptoms. patients with anterior intramuscular transposition had the best outcome followed by those with simple decompression and anterior submuscular transposition. Statistical analysis was not possible for patients with Mc Gowan Grade 1 because of the small numbers of patients in several treatment modality groups. Conclusions. Formulating a uniform guideline for operative treatment is not possible bused on the results of this study. However, the authors believe that support is given to their policy, which is primarily to perform a simple decompression. Its surgical simplicity with preservation of the anatomy, especially the vascularization, and the possibility of rapid postoperative rehabilitation are also taken into consideration. If subluxation is found intraoperatively, anterior transposition is proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 727
页数:6
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   THE TREATMENT OF THE CUBITAL TUNNEL-SYNDROME [J].
ADELAAR, RS ;
FOSTER, WC ;
MCDOWELL, C .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 9 (01) :90-95
[2]  
ALNOT J Y, 1992, Annales de Chirurgie de la Main et du Membre Superieur, V11, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0753-9053(05)80046-8
[3]   ANATOMICAL BASIS FOR A TECHNIQUE OF ULNAR NERVE TRANSPOSITION [J].
AMADIO, PC .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 1986, 8 (03) :155-161
[4]  
ASSMUS H, 1994, NERVENARZT, V65, P846
[5]  
ASSMUS H, 1984, NEUROCHIRURGIA, V27, P181
[6]   POSTTRAUMATIC ULNAR NEUROPATHY VERSUS NONTRAUMATIC CUBITAL TUNNEL-SYNDROME - CLINICAL-FEATURES AND RESPONSE TO SURGERY [J].
BARRIOS, C ;
GANOZA, C ;
DEPABLOS, J ;
CANADELL, J .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1991, 110 (1-2) :44-48
[7]  
BIMMLER DR, 1992, THESIS U ZURICH
[8]  
BRAUN FM, 1995, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V81, P240
[9]  
CHAISE F, 1983, J CHIR-PARIS, V120, P251
[10]   ULNAR NEUROPATHY AT THE ELBOW - COMPARISON OF SIMPLE DECOMPRESSION AND ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION [J].
CHAN, RC ;
PAINE, KWE ;
VARUGHESE, G .
NEUROSURGERY, 1980, 7 (06) :545-550