Methods for estimation of bone marrow plasma cell involvement in myeloma: Predictive value for response and survival in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

被引:47
作者
Rajkumar, SV
Fonseca, R
Dispenzieri, A
Lacy, MQ
Lust, JA
Witzig, TE
Therneau, TM
Kyle, RA
Greipp, PR
Gertz, MA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Hematol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
multiple myeloma; stem cell transplantation; plasma cell; bone marrow; prognosis;
D O I
10.1002/ajh.10003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In myeloma, the bone marrow plasma cell percentage (BMPC%) is usually estimated independently on the aspirate, core biopsy, and plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) samples. This study was done to determine which of the 3 individual estimates correlates best with complete response (CR) and survival. Seventy-five consecutive patients who underwent SCT for relapsed myeloma were studied. The median BMPC% on the marrow aspirate, core biopsy, and PCLI studies were 20, 25, and 20, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the three methods, rho > 0.65, P < 0.001. However, in 8% of patients the BMPC% was different by an absolute value of 50% between methods. No individual method was predictive for CR. However, the highest estimate of the BMPC% among the three methods was a significant predictor of CR (P = 0.02). Survival following SCT was longer among patients with a low BMPC% (less than or equal to 60) by the PCLI method compared to those with higher values, median survival 23 versus 7 months, respectively, P = 0.02. PFS was also different, with survival times of 11 and 5 months, respectively, P = 0.003. Similar results were obtained when the highest estimate of the BMPC% was used in survival analysis (P = 0.02 and 0.004, respectively). Statistical significance was lower when the BMPC% on the aspirate or biopsy used in survival analysis. Compared to any individual method of estimating BMPC%, the highest estimate of the BMPC% is the best predictor of CR in myeloma. It is also prognostic for poor survival and PFS following SCT for myeloma. We recommend that all three methods of estimating BMPC% be routinely performed and that the highest value be used for prognostic purposes. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma [J].
Attal, M ;
Harousseau, JL ;
Stoppa, AM ;
Sotto, JJ ;
Fuzibet, JG ;
Rossi, JF ;
Casassus, P ;
Maisonneuve, H ;
Facon, T ;
Ifrah, N ;
Payen, C ;
Bataille, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (02) :91-97
[2]   Total therapy with tandem transplants for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [J].
Barlogie, B ;
Jagannath, S ;
Desikan, KR ;
Mattox, S ;
Vesole, D ;
Siegel, D ;
Tricot, G ;
Munshi, N ;
Fassas, A ;
Singhal, S ;
Mehta, J ;
Anaissie, E ;
Dhodapkar, D ;
Naucke, S ;
Cromer, J ;
Sawyer, J ;
Epstein, J ;
Spoon, D ;
Ayers, D ;
Cheson, B ;
Crowley, J .
BLOOD, 1999, 93 (01) :55-65
[3]   Multiple myeloma [J].
Bataille, R ;
Harousseau, JL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (23) :1657-1664
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]   Cancer statistics, 2000 [J].
Greenlee, RT ;
Murray, T ;
Bolden, S ;
Wingo, PA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2000, 50 (01) :7-33
[6]   Plasmablastic morphology - An independent prognostic factor with clinical and laboratory correlates: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) myeloma trial E9486 report by the ECOG Myeloma Laboratory Group [J].
Greipp, PR ;
Leong, T ;
Bennett, JM ;
Gaillard, JP ;
Klein, B ;
Stewart, JA ;
Oken, MM ;
Kay, NE ;
Van Ness, B ;
Kyle, RA .
BLOOD, 1998, 91 (07) :2501-2507
[7]  
GREIPP PR, 1993, BLOOD, V81, P3382
[8]  
GREIPP PR, 1992, SEMIN HEMATOL, V29, P24
[9]  
Harousseau JL, 1997, SEMIN HEMATOL, V34, P61
[10]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481