Somatostatin increases growth hormone (GH) secretion in a subpopulation of porcine somatotropes: Evidence for functional and morphological heterogeneity among porcine GH-Producing cells

被引:46
作者
Castano, JP [1 ]
Torronteras, R [1 ]
Ramirez, JL [1 ]
Gribouval, A [1 ]
SanchezHormigo, A [1 ]
RuizNavarro, A [1 ]
GraciaNavarro, F [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CORDOBA, FAC SCI, DEPT CELL BIOL, E-14004 CORDOBA, SPAIN
关键词
D O I
10.1210/en.137.1.129
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Previous results demonstrate that porcine somatotropes can be separated by density gradient centrifugation into low density (LD) and high density (HD) subpopulations. In rat, two analog somatotrope subpopulations differ morphologically and functionally. In an attempt to determine whether morphological differences were also present within LD and HD porcine somatotropes, we undertook a quantitative electron microscope study of the subcellular organelles of immunoidentified LD and HD somatotropes. In addition, to test for the existence of functional differences, cultures of separated HD and LD subpopulations were treated for 4 h with or without 10 nM GRF-(1-29) and/or 100 nM somatostatin (SRIF), and porcine GTT release and intracellular content were evaluated using a homologous enzyme immunoassay. Morphometric results demonstrate that LD somatotropes are smaller in size (P < 0.05) and contain fewer secretory granules (P < 0.05) and more rough endoplasmic reticulum (P < 0.05) than HD somatotropes. In terms of secretion, LD somatotropes showed a classical response; GRF increased GH release 1.7-fold (n = 6; P < 0.05) over the control value, whereas treatment with SRIF alone did not affect basal GH release in this subpopulation, but partially blocked GRF-induced GH release. HD somatotropes responded to GRF with a similar 1.7-fold increase in GH release. However, SRIF administered alone or in combination with GRF exerted a paradoxical stimulatory effect on HD somatotropes (2.15- and 2.12-fold over control value, respectively; n = 6; P < 0.05). These results demonstrate that the porcine somatotrope population is composed of two major subpopulations that display a distinctive pattern of ultrastructural organization and a markedly divergent secretory response to in vitro SRIF treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
ANDERSON LL, 1991, P SOC EXP BIOL MED, V196, P194, DOI 10.3181/00379727-196-43179
[2]   INVITRO REGULATION OF GROWTH-HORMONE (GH) RELEASE FROM OVINE PITUITARY-CELLS DURING FETAL AND NEONATAL DEVELOPMENT - EFFECTS OF GH-RELEASING FACTOR, SOMATOSTATIN, AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-I [J].
BLANCHARD, MM ;
GOODYER, CG ;
CHARRIER, J ;
BARENTON, B .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1988, 122 (05) :2114-2120
[3]   TISSUE DISTRIBUTION OF SOMATOSTATIN RECEPTOR SUBTYPE MESSENGER-RIBONUCLEIC-ACID IN THE RAT [J].
BRUNO, JF ;
XU, Y ;
SONG, JF ;
BERELOWITZ, M .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1993, 133 (06) :2561-2567
[4]   SOMATOSTATIN REGULATES SOMATOSTATIN RECEPTOR SUBTYPE MESSENGER-RNA EXPRESSION IN GH(3) CELLS [J].
BRUNO, JF ;
XU, Y ;
BERELOWITZ, M .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1994, 202 (03) :1738-1743
[5]   DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE OF AMPHIBIAN PRL AND TSH PITUITARY-CELLS TO INVITRO TRH TREATMENT [J].
CASTANO, JP ;
RAMIREZ, JL ;
MALAGON, MM ;
GRACIANAVARRO, F .
GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1992, 88 (02) :178-187
[6]  
COWAN JS, 1983, ENDOCRINOLOGY, V119, P2047
[7]  
DACHEUX F, 1980, CELL TISSUE RES, V207, P277
[8]   MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL-HETEROGENEITY OF FROG MELANOTROPE CELLS [J].
DEAGUILAR, JLG ;
GRACIANAVARRO, F ;
TONON, MC ;
RUIZNAVARRO, A ;
VAUDRY, H .
NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 1994, 59 (02) :176-182
[9]   GROWTH-HORMONE RELEASING FACTORS AND SECRETION OF GROWTH-HORMONE IN SHEEP, CALVES AND PIGS [J].
DELLAFERA, MA ;
BUONOMO, FC ;
BAILE, CA .
DOMESTIC ANIMAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1986, 3 (03) :165-176
[10]   APPLICATION OF AN OPTIMIZED IMMUNOSTAINING TECHNIQUE TO EVALUATE THE HETEROGENEOUS SECRETORY RESPONSE FROM PORCINE SOMATOTROPES BY CELL BLOTTING [J].
DOBADOBERRIOS, PM ;
RUIZNAVARRO, A ;
TORRONTERAS, R ;
GRACIANAVARRO, F .
JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 40 (11) :1715-1724