A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures

被引:50
作者
Barton, GR [1 ]
Bankart, J [1 ]
Davis, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC, Inst Hearing Res, Nottingham, England
关键词
hearing-impairment; utility; EQ-5D HU13; SF-6D;
D O I
10.1080/14992020500057566
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of hearing-impaired adults. as assessed by three different utility measures - the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HU13), and the SF-6D (derived from the SF-36 questionnaire). Measuring quality of life in terms of utility enables the benefits of many interventions to be compared on a common scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to perfect health. Utility scores for 915 new referrals (mean age 69 years, 55% male) to four UK audiology clinics were estimated, The mean utility scores on the EQ-5D (0.79), SF-6D (0.77), and HU13 (0.56) were all significantly different from each other. The agreement between measures was most commonly moderate according to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.36 to 0.58). This suggests that different utility measures will provide different estimates of the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision: Results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D [J].
Barton G.R. ;
Bankart J. ;
Davis A.C. ;
Summerfield Q.A. .
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2004, 3 (2) :103-105
[2]  
Barton GR, 2003, AUDIOL MED, V1, P107
[3]   The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes [J].
Bess, FH .
EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (04) :74S-79S
[4]   Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication [J].
Bosch, JL ;
Hunink, MGM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (06) :591-601
[5]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[6]   A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Tsuchiya, A ;
Busschbach, J .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (09) :873-884
[7]   TESTING THE VALIDITY OF THE EUROQOL AND COMPARING IT WITH THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BRAZIER, J ;
JONES, N ;
KIND, P .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (03) :169-180
[8]  
Brazier J., 1999, J Health Serv Res Policy, V4, P174, DOI [10.1177/135581969900400310, DOI 10.1177/135581969900400310]
[9]   VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRAZIER, JE ;
HARPER, R ;
JONES, NMB ;
OCATHAIN, A ;
THOMAS, KJ ;
USHERWOOD, T ;
WESTLAKE, L .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846) :160-164
[10]   Missing .... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data [J].
Briggs, A ;
Clark, T ;
Wolstenholme, J ;
Clarke, P .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (05) :377-392