The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England

被引:171
作者
Weller, D. [1 ]
Coleman, D. [2 ]
Robertson, R. [1 ]
Butler, P. [2 ]
Melia, J. [2 ]
Campbell, C. [1 ]
Parker, R. [3 ]
Patnick, J. [4 ]
Moss, S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Inst Canc Res, Canc Screening Evaluat Unit, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
[3] Hosp St Cross, Bowel Canc Screening Unit, Rugby CV22 5PX, England
[4] NHS Canc Screening Programmes, Sheffield S4 7UQ, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
colorectal neoplasms; mass screening; faecal occult blood;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604089
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
An evaluation of the second round of faecal occult blood ( FOB) screening in the English site of the UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot ( comprising the Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot based in Rugby, general practices in four Primary Care Trusts, and their associated hospitals) was carried out. A total of 127746 men and women aged 50-69 and registered in participating general practices were invited to participate. In all, 15.9% were new invitees not included in the previous round. A total of 52.1% of invitees returned a screening kit. Uptake varied with gender, age, and level of deprivation; was lower than in the first round (51.9 vs 58.5% P<0.0001), but was high (81.1%) in those who had participated in the first round with a negative result. Test positivity was 1.77%, significantly higher than in the first round, and the detection rate of neoplasia similar (5.67 per 1000), resulting in a lower positive predictive value. The sensitivity of FOBt in the first round was estimated as 57.7-64.4%. There was a significant impact on workload, particularly on endoscopy services. The cancer detection rate (0.94 per 1000) was lower than in the first round. Effort will be required to minimise inequalities in uptake, and to ensure adequate capacity of endoscopy services.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1605
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ENGLISH PILOT BOWEL
[2]   ESTIMATING THE SENSITIVITY OF A SCREENING-TEST [J].
DAY, NE .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1985, 39 (04) :364-366
[3]   Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients [J].
Ko, CW ;
Sonnenberg, A .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 129 (04) :1163-1170
[4]   Surveillance colonoscopy in patients with colorectal cancer: How often should we be doing it? [J].
Mathew, J ;
Saklani, AK ;
Borghol, M .
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2006, 4 (01) :3-5
[5]   Interval cancers in a randomized controlled trial of screening for colorectal cancer using a faecal occult blood test [J].
Moss, SM ;
Hardcastle, JD ;
Coleman, DA ;
Robinson, MHE ;
Rodrigues, VC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (03) :386-390
[6]  
*NHS CANC SCR PROG, NAT BOW CANC SCREEN
[7]  
*OFF DEP PRIM MIN, 2004, IND DEPR
[8]   Is population screening for colorectal cancer cost-effective? [J].
Pignone, M .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 2 (07) :288-289
[9]   Social deprivation and outcomes in colorectal cancer [J].
Smith, J. J. ;
Tilney, H. S. ;
Heriot, A. G. ;
Darzi, A. W. ;
Forbes, H. ;
Thompson, M. R. ;
Stamatakis, J. D. ;
Tekkis, P. P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (09) :1123-1131
[10]   Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom [J].
Steele, RJC .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7458) :133-135