Underutilization of digital rectal examination when screening for prostate cancer

被引:17
作者
Murthy, GD
Byron, DP
Pasquale, D
机构
[1] Stratton VA Med Ctr, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Albany Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Albany, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.164.3.313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: Screening for prostate cancer is controversial. American Cancer Society and American Urology Association recommend screening with both digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Often, PSA testing is not combined with DRE when screening for prostate cancer. Methods: We collected a list of veteran outpatients who had PSA testing performed between june 1, 1998, and September 30, 1998, from our computerized database. We reviewed their records for documentation of age, race, urinary symptoms, family history of prostate cancer, DRE, and professional training and sex of the health care provider. Results: Of the 588 records reviewed, DRE was not performed in 311 patients (52.9%). Digital rectal examination was not performed in 276 (53.2%) of 519 patients who had a PSA level less than 4.0 ng/mL; in 202 (58.7%) of 344 patients by male providers and in 109 (44.9%) of 243 patients by female providers (P < .001); and in 231 (61.1%) of 378 patients by doctors of medicine (MDs), 24 (40%) of 60 patients by physician assistants (PAs), and in 56 (37.3%) of 150 patients by nurse practitioners (NPs) (MDs vs PAs, P < .001; MDs vs NPs, P < .001; and NPs vs PAs, P = .42). Conclusions: Digital rectal examination is underutilized when screening for prostate cancer. This leads to nondetection of some prostate cancers. Although the DRE rate was poor among all health care providers, female providers and physician extenders outperformed male providers and physicians, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 316
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
Alexander FE, 1999, EUR J CANCER, V35, P262
[2]
Early detection of prostate cancer .1. Prior probability and effectiveness of tests [J].
Coley, CM ;
Barry, MJ ;
Fleming, C ;
Mulley, AG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (05) :394-406
[3]
Gillatt D, 1997, HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.3310/HTA1020
[4]
Cancer statistics, 2001 [J].
Greenlee, RT ;
Hill-Harmon, MB ;
Murray, T ;
Thun, M .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2001, 51 (01) :15-36
[5]
PROSTATE-CANCER SCREENING - WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW [J].
KRAMER, BS ;
BROWN, ML ;
PROROK, PC ;
POTOSKY, AL ;
GOHAGAN, JK .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (09) :914-923
[6]
LAZARO M, 1997, LIPPINCOTTS PRIM CAR, V1, P408
[7]
Screening for prostate cancer: A comparison of urologists and primary care physicians [J].
McKnight, JT ;
Tietze, PH ;
Adcock, BB ;
Maxwell, AJ ;
Smith, WO ;
Nagy, MC .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 89 (09) :885-888
[8]
MEIKLE AW, 1990, UROL CLIN N AM, V17, P709
[9]
DEFINING AND UPDATING THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY GUIDELINES FOR THE CANCER-RELATED CHECKUP - PROSTATE AND ENDOMETRIAL CANCERS [J].
METTLIN, C ;
JONES, G ;
AVERETTE, H ;
GUSBERG, SB ;
MURPHY, GP .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1993, 43 (01) :42-46
[10]
Neal D E, 2000, Lancet Oncol, V1, P17, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00005-X