Transmembrane helix prediction: a comparative evaluation and analysis

被引:105
作者
Cuthbertson, JM [1 ]
Doyle, DA [1 ]
Sansom, MSP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Biochem, Oxford OX1 3QU, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
channel; membrane protein; pore; prediction; secondary structure; transmembrane helix;
D O I
10.1093/protein/gzi032
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The prediction of transmembrane (TM) helices plays an important role in the study of membrane proteins, given the relatively small number (similar to 0.5% of the PDB) of high-resolution structures for such proteins. We used two datasets (one redundant and one non-redundant) of high-resolution structures of membrane proteins to evaluate and analyse TM helix prediction. The redundant (non-redundant) dataset contains structure of 434 (268) TM helices, from 112 (73) polypeptide chains. Of the 434 helices in the dataset, 20 may be classified as 'half-TM' as they are too short to span a lipid bilayer. We compared 13 TM helix prediction methods, evaluating each method using per segment, per residue and termini scores. Four methods consistently performed well: SPLIT4, TMHMM2, HMMTOP2 and TMAP. However, even the best methods were in error by, on average, about two turns of helix at the TM helix termini. The best and worst case predictions for individual proteins were analysed. In particular, the performance of the various methods and of a consensus prediction method, were compared for a number of proteins (e.g. SecY, CIC, KvAP) containing half-TM helices. The difficulties of predicting half-TM helices suggests that current prediction methods successfully embody the two-state model of membrane protein folding, but do not accommodate a third stage in which, e.g., short helices and re-entrant loops fold within a bundle of stable TM helices.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 308
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Secondary active transport mediated by a prokaryotic homologue of ClC Cl- channels [J].
Accardi, A ;
Miller, C .
NATURE, 2004, 427 (6977) :803-807
[2]   Statistical analysis of predicted transmembrane α-helices [J].
Arkin, IT ;
Brunger, AT .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND MOLECULAR ENZYMOLOGY, 1998, 1429 (01) :113-128
[3]  
Arkin IT, 1997, PROTEINS, V28, P465, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199708)28:4<465::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-9
[5]   Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0 [J].
Bendtsen, JD ;
Nielsen, H ;
von Heijne, G ;
Brunak, S .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 340 (04) :783-795
[6]   A knowledge-based scale for the analysis and prediction of buried and exposed faces of transmembrane domain proteins [J].
Beuming, T ;
Weinstein, H .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (12) :1822-1835
[7]   Unravelling the folding of bacteriorhodopsin [J].
Booth, PJ .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS, 2000, 1460 (01) :4-14
[8]   Helix packing in membrane proteins [J].
Bowie, JU .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 272 (05) :780-789
[9]   Analysis of side-chain rotamers in transmembrane proteins [J].
Chamberlain, AK ;
Bowie, JU .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 87 (05) :3460-3469
[10]   Transmembrane helix predictions revisited [J].
Chen, CP ;
Kernytsky, A ;
Rost, B .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (12) :2774-2791