The influence of direct payments on farmers' hail insurance decisions

被引:54
作者
Finger, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Lehmann, Niklaus [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Agri Food & Agri Environm Econ Grp, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Wageningen Univ, Agr Econ & Rural Policy Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
D0; G2; Q1; Hail insurance; Demand; Adoption determinants; Direct payments; Switzerland; COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; WEATHER DERIVATIVES; RISK; MANAGEMENT; COPE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00587.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
We analyze determinants of hail insurance use of Swiss farmers, using FADN panel data covering the period 19902009. Mixed effect logistic regression models are estimated to identify the most important farm and farmer characteristics that trigger insurance use. In addition, information on local hail risk is taken into account in these models. It shows that larger farms, with specialization in crop production, and with larger local hail risks are more likely to adopt the hail insurance. Moreover, insurance users are usually older and better educated. Since the early 1990s, Swiss agricultural policy has reduced price support and introduced general and ecological direct payments. This has led to a much higher importance of direct payments for farmers incomes. Our analysis shows that this development has contributed to decreasing hail insurance adoption rates in Switzerland over the period considered. Our results indicate that the larger the share of direct payments for total farm revenue, the less attractive is insurance as a risk management strategy for farmers. This interdependency should be explicitly considered by agricultural policy in the design of support mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 354
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   The Common Agricultural Policy and Its Reform: The Problem of Reconciling Budget and Trade Concerns [J].
Ackrill, Robert ;
Kay, Adrian ;
Morgan, Wyn .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2008, 56 (04) :393-411
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Econometric Methods
[3]  
Asseldonk M. A. P. M. van, 2002, Review of Agricultural Economics, V24, P196, DOI 10.1111/1467-9353.00091
[4]  
Bhaskar A, 2009, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V34, P130
[5]  
Bielza Diaz-Caneja M., 2008, Agricultural Insurance Schemes
[6]  
BLW, 2011, VERN AGR 2014 2017
[7]  
Cabas J. H., 2008, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V37, P92
[8]  
Chakir R., 2010, INRA AGROPARISTECH W
[9]  
Dux D., 2010, GRUNDLAGENBERICHT 20
[10]   A LEISURELY LOOK AT THE BOOTSTRAP, THE JACKKNIFE, AND CROSS-VALIDATION [J].
EFRON, B ;
GONG, G .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1983, 37 (01) :36-48