The interaction between textual structures and prior knowledge:: Hypotheses, data and simulations

被引:4
作者
Caillies, S
Denhière, G
机构
[1] Univ Reims Champagne Ardennes, CIRLEP, F-51096 Reims, France
[2] Univ Aix Marseille 1, CNRS, UMR 6561, Lab Psychol Cognit, F-13331 Marseille 3, France
关键词
causality; prior knowledge; simulation; text comprehension;
D O I
10.1007/BF03172992
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Our purpose was to compare the effect of two types of textual semantic coherence - causal and teleological - oil the organization of the mental representation elaborated after reading by learners with different levels of prior knowledge. Beginners, Intermediates and Advanced in computer domain read either the causal or the teleological version of a text describing three functions of a text editor, then performed a cued recall and a recognition task. We assumed that Advanced learners build a mental representation of the domain organized in a hierarchical goal/sub-goals structure, whereas Beginners and Intermediates have a mental representation organized in a causal path. If this is so, the results should indicate a significant interaction between prior knowledge and the semantic coherence of the texts: for the Advanced learners, recall and recognition of the teleological text should be better, whereas for the Beginners and Intermediates, the reverse was expected. As we assumed, results indicated that a teleological organization of textual information facilitated the comprehension of Advanced participants while a temporal-causal organization facilitated the comprehension of Beginner and Intermediate participants. The Construction-Integration model of Kintsch (1988, 1998) was used to simulate the recall results and to reproduce the effect of prior knowledge on the retrieval of textual information.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 31
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
BAUDET S, 1988, EUROPEAN J PSYCHOL E, V3, P163
[2]  
BAUDET S, 1991, TEXT TEXT PROCESSING, V79, P155
[3]   ACQUISITION OF DOMAIN-RELATED INFORMATION IN RELATION TO HIGH AND LOW DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE [J].
CHIESI, HL ;
SPILICH, GJ ;
VOSS, JF .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1979, 18 (03) :257-273
[4]   COGNITIVE-PSYCHOLOGY AND TEXT-PROCESSING - FROM TEXT REPRESENTATION TO TEXT-WORLD [J].
DENHIERE, G ;
BAUDET, S .
SEMIOTICA, 1989, 77 (1-3) :271-293
[5]  
Denhiere G., 1984, ETAIT FOIS COMPREHEN
[6]  
DENHIERE G, 1982, CODING KNOWLEDGE REP, P139
[7]  
Denhiere G., 1992, LECT COMPREHENSION T
[8]  
DENHIERE G, 1987, LEARN INSTR, P75
[9]   THE ROLE OF EXPLICIT ACTION STATEMENTS IN UNDERSTANDING AND USING WRITTEN DIRECTIONS [J].
DIXON, P ;
FARIES, J ;
GABRYS, G .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1988, 27 (06) :649-667
[10]   EFFECTS OF SENTENCE FORM ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF MENTAL PLANS FROM PROCEDURAL DISCOURSE [J].
DIXON, P ;
HARRISON, K ;
TAYLOR, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1993, 47 (02) :375-400