Outcome trials of COX-2 selective inhibitors:: global safety evaluation does not promise benefits

被引:19
作者
Cerezo, JG
Hristov, RL
Sansuán, AJC
Rodríguez, JJV
机构
[1] Hosp Univ La Paz, Serv Farmacol, Madrid 28046, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ La Paz, Serv Internal Med, Madrid 28046, Spain
[3] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Sch Med, Dept Med, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[4] Autonomous Univ Madrid, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ La Paz, Serv Clin Pharmacol, Madrid 28046, Spain
关键词
COX-2 selective inhibitors; outcome trials; gastrointestinal safety; global safety; gastroprotective cotherapy; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs;
D O I
10.1007/s00228-003-0579-1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background. Gastrointestinal toxicity is the most frequent adverse effect associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. The most clinically relevant side effects of this toxicity are ulcer complications, including perforation, obstruction, or bleeding. Selective cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs) have been proposed as a safer alternative to traditional, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and they are currently widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this review was to analyze the available evidence and then critically evaluate the outcome trials supporting the use of coxibs in terms of their clinical gastrointestinal benefits and global safety. Methods: All published clinical trials on selective COX-2 inhibitors were identified by searching Medline, the World Wide Web (WWW), and abstracts in Congress proceedings. From these, we selected randomized trials that clinically evaluated relevant safety outcome measures. Papers only describing endoscopic evaluation were excluded. Results: Our search yielded three outcome trials and two pooled safety analyses. The outcome studies supporting the gastrointestinal and global safety of coxibs were found to be biased in their design, analysis, and dissemination, and interpretation of a clinical benefit. Cost considerations would make the use of coxibs acceptable only in patients at high gastrointestinal risk. Conclusions: The association of the reduced gastroerosive potential of coxibs with improved meaningful outcomes is debatable. Bias in the design of the trials, selection of outcome measures, post-hoc changes in analysis and the variables used, as well as flaws in the publication and reporting of trial results cast serious doubts on the gastrointestinal and global safety profile of coxibs. In addition, their high cost and the lack of clear identification of patients that would benefit most from treatment means the effectiveness of these drugs is uncertain at the moment.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 175
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   COMPLETENESS OF REPORTING TRIAL RESULTS - EFFECT ON PHYSICIANS WILLINGNESS TO PRESCRIBE [J].
BOBBIO, M ;
DEMICHELIS, B ;
GIUSTETTO, G .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8907) :1209-1211
[2]   Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. [J].
Bombardier, C ;
Laine, L ;
Reicin, A ;
Shapiro, D ;
Burgos-Vargas, R ;
Davis, B ;
Day, R ;
Ferraz, MB ;
Hawkey, CJ ;
Hochberg, MC ;
Kvien, TK ;
Schnitzer, TJ ;
Weaver, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (21) :1520-1528
[3]   A framework for evaluating the clinical consequences of initial therapy with NSAIDs, NSAIDs plus gastroprotective agents, or celecoxib in the treatment of arthritis [J].
Burke, TA ;
Zabinski, RA ;
Pettitt, D ;
Maniadakis, N ;
Maurath, CJ ;
Goldstein, JL .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (01) :33-47
[4]   Preventing recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection who are taking low-dose aspirin or naproxen [J].
Chan, FKL ;
Chung, SCS ;
Suen, BY ;
Lee, YT ;
Leung, WK ;
Leung, VKS ;
Wu, JCY ;
Lau, JYW ;
Hui, Y ;
Lai, MS ;
Chan, HLY ;
Sung, JJY .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (13) :967-973
[5]   Efficacy, tolerability, and upper gastrointestinal safety of celecoxib for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Deeks, JJ ;
Smith, LA ;
Bradley, MD .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7365) :619-623
[6]  
*DGFPS, 2002, RES EST NEC VIS INS
[7]  
*FDA ADV COMM, 2000, CEL MED OFF GASTR RE
[8]  
*FDA ADV COMM, 2000, CEL STAT REV CLASS S
[9]  
*FDA ADV COMM, 2000, CEL MED OFF REV CLAS
[10]  
*FDA ADV COMM, 2000, ROF STAT REV VIGOR S