Bed, bath and beyond:: pitfalls in prompt eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrier status in healthcare workers

被引:48
作者
Kniehl, E [1 ]
Becker, A [1 ]
Forster, DH [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Karlsruhe, ZLMT, Dept Microbiol & Infect Control, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); staff; eradication treatment; household contamination;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2004.06.016
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Heatthcare workers (HCWs) in close contact with patients cotonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were screened for MRSA acquisition. From 1995 to 2001, MRSA was identified from the nasopharyngeal. swabs of 87 HCWs, collected one to two weeks after contact with 592 known MRSA-positive patients. These HCWs were withdrawn from work and treated with topical. antibiotics/antiseptics. They were advised to disinfect their bathrooms and personal hygiene articles, and to wash bed linen and pillows. They were screened for successful eradication for up to three months. Seventy-three (84%) HCWs lost their carrier status. The eradication regimen failed in 14 cases. In 11 of these MRSA was detected only in later nasopharyngeal. swabs (suspected recolonization). Screening identified nasal, colonization of close household contacts in eight of these 11 cases. Environmental sampling detected contamination in seven out of eight screened home environments. When eradication treatment was applied to household contacts and when household surfaces were cleaned and disinfected, the carriage cleared in most cases within a few weeks. However, when home environments are heavily contaminated, despite adequate medical treatment, eradication took upto two years. Due to withdrawal from work, the 14 carriers without prompt and lasting eradication after the first course of treatment accounted for about 70% of all. lost working days. These experiences support the hypothesis that control measures should not be restricted to antibiotic or antiseptic treatment of long-term carriers (HCWs as well as patients), but must also include cleaning and disinfection of the household. (C) 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 187
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Staff carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA 15) and the home environment: A case report
    Allen, KD
    Anson, JJ
    Parsons, LA
    Frost, NG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1997, 35 (04) : 307 - 311
  • [2] [Anonymous], BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBL
  • [3] EMERGENCE OF NOSOCOMIAL METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS AND THERAPY OF COLONIZED PERSONNEL DURING A HOSPITAL-WIDE OUTBREAK
    BACON, AE
    JORGENSEN, KA
    WILSON, KH
    KAUFFMAN, CA
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 8 (04) : 145 - 150
  • [4] MRSA patients: proven methods to treat colonization and infection
    Boyce, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2001, 48 : S9 - S14
  • [5] *BRIT SOC ANT CHEM, 1998, J HOSP INFECT, V42, P253
  • [6] MINIMAL DOSE REQUIREMENTS FOR NASAL MUPIROCIN AND ITS ROLE IN THE CONTROL OF EPIDEMIC MRSA
    CASEWELL, MW
    HILL, RLR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1991, 19 : 35 - 40
  • [7] CEINKAYA Y, 2000, J CHEMOTHER, V12, P138
  • [8] STAFF CARRIAGE OF EPIDEMIC METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
    COOKSON, B
    PETERS, B
    WEBSTER, M
    PHILLIPS, I
    RAHMAN, M
    NOBLE, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 27 (07) : 1471 - 1476
  • [9] A MAJOR OUTBREAK OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS CAUSED BY A NEW PHAGE-TYPE (EMRSA-16)
    COX, RA
    CONQUEST, C
    MALLAGHAN, C
    MARPLES, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1995, 29 (02) : 87 - 106
  • [10] INTRACTABLE NASAL CARRIAGE OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
    GAWLER, DM
    ROYLE, JP
    TOSOLINI, FA
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1980, 1 (12) : 607 - 608