Continuous infraclavicular perineural infusion with clonidine and ropivacaine compared with ropivacaine alone: A randomized, double-blinded, controlled study

被引:40
作者
Ilfeld, BM
Morey, TE
Enneking, FK
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000075840.52964.A7
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Although clonidine has been shown to increase the duration of local anesthetic action and prolong postoperative analgesia when included in single-injection nerve blocks, a controlled investigation of the efficacy of this practice to improve analgesia for continuous perineural local anesthetic infusion has not been reported. In this study, ambulatory patients (n = 34) undergoing moderately painful upper extremity orthopedic surgery received an infraclavicular brachial plexus block (mepivacaine 1.5%, epinephrine 2.5 mug/mL, and bicarbonate 0.1 mEq/mL) and a perineural catheter before surgery. After surgery, patients were discharged home with a portable infusion pump delivering either ropivacaine 0.2% or ropivacaine 0.2% plus clonidine 1 mug/mL via the catheter for 3 days (basal, 8 mL/h; patient-controlled bolus, 2 mL every 20 min). Investigators and patients were blinded to random group assignment. Daily end-points included pain scores, patient-controlled bolus doses, oral analgesic use, sleep quality, and symptoms of catheter- or infusion-related complications. Adding clonidine to ropivacaine resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the number of self-administered 2-mL bolus doses on postoperative Days 0 and 1 (P < 0.02), but this decreased actual local anesthetic consumption by an average of only 2-7 mL/d (P < 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for any of the other variables investigated, including sleep quality or oral analgesic requirements. We conclude that adding 1 mug/mL of clonidine to a ropivacaine infraclavicular perineural infusion does not provide clinically relevant improvements in analgesia, sleep quality, or oral analgesic requirements for ambulatory patients having moderately painful upper extremity surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 712
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Dose-range effects of clonidine added to lidocaine for brachial plexus block [J].
Bernard, JM ;
Macaire, P .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (02) :277-284
[2]   Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery [J].
Capdevila, X ;
Barthelet, Y ;
Biboulet, P ;
Ryckwaert, Y ;
Rubenovitch, J ;
d'Athis, F .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (01) :8-15
[3]   Small-dose clonidine prolongs postoperative analgesia after sciatic-femoral nerve block with 0.75% ropivacaine for foot surgery [J].
Casati, A ;
Magistris, L ;
Fanelli, G ;
Beccaria, P ;
Cappelleri, G ;
Aldegheri, G ;
Torri, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (02) :388-392
[4]  
Culebras X, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P199
[5]   INTRAVENOUS OR EPIDURAL CLONIDINE FOR INTRAOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA [J].
DEKOCK, M ;
CROCHET, B ;
MORIMONT, C ;
SCHOLTES, JL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (03) :525-531
[6]   alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia - A clinical review of clonidine (1984-1995) [J].
Eisenach, JC ;
DeKock, M ;
Klimscha, W .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (03) :655-674
[7]   EPIDURAL CLONIDINE ANALGESIA FOLLOWING SURGERY - PHASE-I [J].
EISENACH, JC ;
LYSAK, SZ ;
VISCOMI, CM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 71 (05) :640-646
[8]   LOCAL-ANESTHETIC MYOTOXICITY - A CASE AND REVIEW [J].
HOGAN, Q ;
DOTSON, R ;
ERICKSON, S ;
KETTLER, R ;
HOGAN, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (04) :942-947
[9]   Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home - A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study [J].
Ilfeld, BM ;
Morey, TE ;
Enneking, FK .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (06) :1297-1304
[10]   Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home [J].
Ilfeld, BM ;
Morey, TE ;
Wang, RD ;
Enneking, FK .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (04) :959-965