Rural-urban differences in health care benefits of a community-based sample of at-risk drinkers

被引:6
作者
Fortney, JC
Booth, BM
Kirchner, JE
Han, XT
机构
[1] Freeway Medical Tower, Little Rock, AR 72204
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb00576.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context: Different types of health plan cost-containment strategies (eg, gatekeeping, selective contracting, and cost-sharing) may affect the utilization of behavioral health services differently in urban and rural areas. Purpose: This research compares the cost-containment strategies used by the health plans of insured at-risk drinkers residing in rural anti urban areas, Methods: A screening instrument for at-risk drinking was administered by phone to approximately 12 000 residents of 6 southern states; 442 at-risk drinkers completed 4 interviews over a 2-year period and consented to release insurance and medical records. Two thirds of the sample (n = 294) were insured during the last 6 months of the study. In 1998, health plan characteristics were successfully collected for 217 (72.3%) of the insured at-risk drinkers, representing 113 different health plans and 206 different policies. Findings: Compared With urban at-risk drinkers, rural at-risk drinkers were significantly less likely to be enrolled in a health plan with gatekeeping policies,for both behavioral health (P = .001), and physical health (P = .031). Compared with urban enrollees, rural enrollees were significantly more likely to pay deductibles (P = .042), to pay coinsurance for physical health services (P = .002), and to have limits placed on physical health services use (P = .067), but they were less likely to pay copayments for physical health (P = .046). Rural enrollees were less likely to face higher copayments (P = .007) and higher coinsurance (P = .076) for mental health than for physical health, compared to urban enrollees. Conclusions: Because rural residents were more likely to be, enrolled in indemnity plans and less likely to be enrolled in health maintenance organizations, rural at-risk drinkers were enrolled in plans that relied less on supply-side cost-containment strategies and more on demand-side cost-containment strategies targeting physical health service use, compared with their urban counterparts. Rural at-risk drinkers were less likely to be enrolled in health plans with greater cost-sharing for mental health than for physical health compared to urban at-risk drinkers.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Rural at-risk drinkers: Correlates and one-year use of alcoholism treatment services [J].
Booth, BM ;
Kirchner, J ;
Fortney, J ;
Ross, R ;
Rost, K .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2000, 61 (02) :267-277
[2]   Rural and urban problem drinkers in six southern states [J].
Booth, BM ;
Ross, RL ;
Rost, K .
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 1999, 34 (4-5) :471-493
[3]   Short-term course of drinking in an untreated sample of at-risk drinkers [J].
Booth, BM ;
Fortney, SM ;
Fortney, JC ;
Curran, GM ;
Kirchner, JE .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2001, 62 (05) :580-588
[4]   Behavioral health benefits in employer-sponsored health plans, 1997 [J].
Buck, EA ;
Teich, JL ;
Umland, B ;
Stein, MM .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1999, 18 (02) :67-78
[5]  
*BUR LAB STAT, 1992, SUBST AB PROV EMPL B, V2412
[6]  
Casey MM, 1999, RURAL HEALTH IN THE UNITED STATES, P113
[7]   Rural health network development: Public policy issues and state initiatives [J].
Casey, MM ;
Wellever, A ;
Moscovice, I .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLITICS POLICY AND LAW, 1997, 22 (01) :23-47
[8]   HMO financial arrangements with rural physicians [J].
Christianson, JB ;
Hamer, R ;
Knutson, D .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 1997, 13 (03) :240-252
[9]   Do consumers know how their health plan works? [J].
Cunningham, PJ ;
Denk, C ;
Sinclair, M .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (02) :159-166
[10]   Employer-based mental health benefits: Implications for mental health parity [J].
Druss, B ;
Levinson, C ;
Marcus, S .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2000, 51 (04) :455-455