Dissociable mechanisms of cognitive control in prefrontal and premotor cortex

被引:194
作者
Chambers, Christopher D. [1 ]
Bellgrove, Mark A. [2 ]
Gould, Ian C. [2 ]
English, Therese [2 ]
Garavan, Hugh [3 ]
McNaught, Elizabeth [2 ]
Kamke, Marc [2 ]
Mattingley, Jason B. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London WC1N 3AR, England
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Queensland Brain Inst, Cognit Neurosci Lab, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Trinity Coll Dublin, Inst Neurosci, Dublin, Ireland
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.00685.2007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Intelligent behavior depends on the ability to suppress inappropriate actions and resolve interference between competing responses. Recent clinical and neuroimaging evidence has demonstrated the involvement of prefrontal, parietal, and premotor areas during behaviors that emphasize conflict and inhibition. It remains unclear, however, whether discrete subregions within this network are crucial for overseeing more specific inhibitory demands. Here we probed the functional specialization of human prefrontal cortex by combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with integrated behavioral measures of response inhibition (stop- signal task) and response competition (flanker task). Participants undertook a combined stop-signal/flanker task after rTMS of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) or dorsal premotor cortex (dPM) in each hemisphere. Stimulation of the right IFG impaired stop-signal inhibition under conditions of heightened response competition but did not influence the ability to suppress a competing response. In contrast, stimulation of the right dPM facilitated execution but had no effect on inhibition. Neither of these results was observed during rTMS of corresponding left-hemisphere regions. Overall, our findings are consistent with existing evidence that the right IFG is crucial for inhibitory control. The observed double dissociation of neurodisruptive effects between the right IFG and right dPM further implies that response inhibition and execution rely on distinct neural processes despite activating a common cortical network.
引用
收藏
页码:3638 / 3647
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, STOCHASTIC MODELLING
[2]   Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI [J].
Aron, Adam R. ;
Behrens, Tim E. ;
Smith, Steve ;
Frank, Michael J. ;
Poldrack, Russell A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (14) :3743-3752
[3]   Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: Role of the subthalamic nucleus [J].
Aron, AR ;
Poldrack, RA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (09) :2424-2433
[4]   Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans [J].
Aron, AR ;
Fletcher, PC ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :115-116
[5]   Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex [J].
Aron, AR ;
Robbins, TW ;
Poldrack, RA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (04) :170-177
[6]   The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task [J].
Bellgrove, MA ;
Hester, R ;
Garavan, H .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2004, 42 (14) :1910-1916
[7]   BOLD MRI responses to repetitive TMS over human dorsal premotor cortex [J].
Bestmann, S ;
Baudewig, J ;
Siebner, HR ;
Rothwell, JC ;
Frahm, J .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 28 (01) :22-29
[8]   Callosal connections of dorsal versus ventral premotor areas in the macaque monkey:: a multiple retrograde tracing study -: art. no. 67 [J].
Boussaoud, D ;
Tanné-Gariépy, J ;
Wannier, T ;
Rouiller, EM .
BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 6 (1)
[9]   Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection [J].
Bunge, SA ;
Hazeltine, E ;
Scanlon, MD ;
Rosen, AC ;
Gabrieli, JDE .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (03) :1562-1571
[10]   Executive "brake failure" following deactivation of human frontal lobe [J].
Chambers, CD ;
Bellgrove, MA ;
Stokes, MG ;
Henderson, TR ;
Garavan, H ;
Robertson, IH ;
Morris, AP ;
Mattingley, JB .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 18 (03) :444-455