LISA detections of massive black hole inspirals: Parameter extraction errors due to inaccurate template waveforms

被引:146
作者
Cutler, Curt [1 ]
Vallisneri, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2007年 / 76卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104018
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The planned Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is expected to detect the inspiral and merger of massive black hole binaries (MBHBs) at z less than or similar to 5 with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of hundreds to thousands. Because of these high SNRs, and because these SNRs accrete over periods of weeks to months, it should be possible to extract the physical parameters of these systems with high accuracy; for instance, for a similar to 10(6)M(circle dot) MBHBs at z=1 it should be possible to determine the two masses to similar to 0.1% and the sky location to similar to 1 degrees. However, those are just the errors due to noise: there will be additional "theoretical" errors due to inaccuracies in our best model waveforms, which are still only approximate. The goal of this paper is to estimate the typical magnitude of these theoretical errors. We develop mathematical tools for this purpose, and apply them to a somewhat simplified version of the MBHB problem, in which we consider just the inspiral part of the waveform and neglect spin-induced precession, eccentricity, and PN amplitude corrections. For this simplified version, we estimate that theoretical uncertainties in sky position will typically be similar to 1 degrees, i.e., comparable to the statistical uncertainty. For the mass and spin parameters, our results suggest that while theoretical errors will be rather small absolutely, they could still dominate over statistical errors (by roughly an order of magnitude) for the strongest sources. The tools developed here should be useful for estimating the magnitude of theoretical errors in many other problems in gravitational-wave astronomy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Analysis of first LIGO science data for stochastic gravitational waves -: art. no. 122004 [J].
Abbott, B ;
Abbott, R ;
Adhikari, R ;
Ageev, A ;
Allen, B ;
Amin, R ;
Anderson, SB ;
Anderson, WG ;
Araya, M ;
Armandula, H ;
Asiri, F ;
Aufmuth, P ;
Aulbert, C ;
Babak, S ;
Balasubramanian, R ;
Ballmer, S ;
Barish, BC ;
Barker, D ;
Barker-Patton, C ;
Barnes, M ;
Barr, B ;
Barton, MA ;
Bayer, K ;
Beausoleil, R ;
Belczynski, K ;
Bennett, R ;
Berukoff, SJ ;
Betzwieser, J ;
Bhawal, B ;
Bilenko, IA ;
Billingsley, G ;
Black, E ;
Blackburn, K ;
Bland-Weaver, B ;
Bochner, B ;
Bogue, L ;
Bork, R ;
Bose, S ;
Brady, PR ;
Braginsky, VB ;
Brau, JE ;
Brown, DA ;
Brozek, S ;
Bullington, A ;
Buonanno, A ;
Burgess, R ;
Busby, D ;
Butler, WE ;
Byer, RL ;
Cadonati, L .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 69 (12)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Three hundred years of Gravitation
[3]  
ARUN KG, 2007, PHYS REV D, P4002
[4]   Gravitational-wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes [J].
Baker, JG ;
Centrella, J ;
Choi, DI ;
Koppitz, M ;
van Meter, J .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2006, 96 (11)
[5]   Comparisons of binary black hole merger waveforms [J].
Baker, John G. ;
Campanelli, Manuela ;
Pretorius, Frans ;
Zlochower, Yosef .
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2007, 24 (12) :S25-S31
[6]   Confusion noise from LISA capture sources [J].
Barack, L ;
Cutler, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 70 (12) :21
[7]   Components of the giravitational force in the fels of a gravitational wave [J].
Baskaran, D ;
Grishchuk, LP .
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2004, 21 (17) :4041-4061
[8]   LISA observations of massive black hole mergers: event rates and issues in waveform modelling [J].
Berti, Emanuele .
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2006, 23 (19) :S785-S797
[9]   Inspiral, merger, and ringdown of unequal mass black hole binaries: A multipolar analysis [J].
Berti, Emanuele ;
Cardoso, Vitor .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2007, 76 (06)
[10]   Gravitational-wave inspiral of compact binary systems to 7/2 post-Newtonian order [J].
Blanchet, L ;
Faye, G ;
Iyer, BR ;
Joguet, B .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2002, 65 (06)