The use of multivariate MR imaging intensities versus metabolic data from MR spectroscopic imaging for brain tumour classification

被引:65
作者
Devos, A [1 ]
Simonetti, AW
van der Graaf, M
Lukas, L
Suykens, JAK
Vanhamme, L
Buydens, LMC
Heerschap, A
Van Huffel, S
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, ESAT, SCD, SISTA, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Analyt Chem Lab, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
brain tumours; classification; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; linear discriminant analysis; least squares support vector machines;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2004.12.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study investigated the value of information from both magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) to automated discrimination of brain tumours. The influence of imaging intensities and metabolic data was tested by comparing the use of MR spectra from MRSI, MR imaging intensities, peak integration values obtained from the MR spectra and a combination of the latter two. Three classification techniques were objectively compared: linear discriminant analysis, least squares support vector machines (LS-SVM) with a linear kernel as linear techniques and LS-SVM with radial basis function kernel as a nonlinear technique. Classifiers were evaluated over 100 stratified random splittings of the dataset into training and test sets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used as a global performance measure on test data. In general, all techniques obtained a high performance when using peak integration values with or without MR imaging intensities. For example for low- versus high-grade tumours, low- versus high-grade gliomas and gliomas versus meningiomas, the mean test AUC was higher than 0.91, 0.94, and 0.99, respectively, when both MR imaging intensities and peak integration values were used. The use of metabolic data from MRSI significantly improved automated classification of brain tumour types compared to the use of MR imaging intensities solely. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 228
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] RESOLUTION ENHANCEMENT OF PROTEIN PMR SPECTRA USING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BROADENED AND A NORMAL SPECTRUM
    CAMPBELL, ID
    DOBSON, CM
    WILLIAMS, RJP
    XAVIER, AV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1973, 11 (02) : 172 - 181
  • [2] GLIOMAS - CLASSIFICATION WITH MR IMAGING
    DEAN, BL
    DRAYER, BP
    BIRD, CR
    FLOM, RA
    HODAK, JA
    COONS, SW
    CAREY, RG
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) : 411 - 415
  • [3] Classification of brain tumours using short echo time 1H MR spectra
    Devos, A
    Lukas, L
    Suykens, JAK
    Vanhamme, L
    Tate, AR
    Howe, FA
    Majós, C
    Moreno-Torres, A
    van der Graaf, M
    Arús, C
    Van Huffel, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2004, 170 (01) : 164 - 175
  • [4] Duda R.O., 2001, Pattern Classification, V2nd
  • [5] CEREBRAL ASTROCYTOMAS - HISTOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION OF MR AND CT CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT WITH STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY
    EARNEST, F
    KELLY, PJ
    SCHEITHAUER, BW
    KALL, BA
    CASCINO, TL
    EHMAN, RL
    FORBES, GS
    AXLEY, PL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (03) : 823 - 827
  • [6] MCLUST: Software for model-based cluster analysis
    Fraley, C
    Raftery, AE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 1999, 16 (02) : 297 - 306
  • [7] Govindaraju V, 2000, NMR BIOMED, V13, P129, DOI 10.1002/1099-1492(200005)13:3<129::AID-NBM619>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-V
  • [9] A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) : 839 - 843
  • [10] Determination of histopathological tumor grade in neuroepithelial brain tumors by using spectral pattern analysis of in vivo spectroscopic data
    Herminghaus, S
    Dierks, T
    Pilatus, U
    Möller-Hartmann, W
    Wittsack, J
    Marquardt, G
    Labisch, C
    Lanfermann, H
    Schlote, W
    Zanella, FE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 98 (01) : 74 - 81