Rural geography: multifunctional rural geographies - reactionary or radical?

被引:136
作者
McCarthy, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Geog, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1191/0309132505ph584pr
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 782
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
ADRIANSEN HK, 2004, GEOGRAPHIES RURAL CU, P79
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, DOI DOI 10.1080/1045575052000335339
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NEW COUNTRYSIDE GEOG
[4]  
Bakker K., 2004, An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing water in England and Wales
[5]   Sustaining multifunctional agricultural landscapes: comparing stakeholder perspectives in New York (US) and England (UK) [J].
Bills, N ;
Gross, D .
LAND USE POLICY, 2005, 22 (04) :313-321
[6]  
BOHNET I, 2003, LANDSCAPE RES, V28, P341
[7]  
BRIDGE G, 2004, PROF GEOGR, V56, P401
[8]   Commodifying what nature? [J].
Castree, N .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2003, 27 (03) :273-297
[9]  
Cronon W, 1995, UNCOMMON GROUND, P69
[10]   Integrated working landscape protection: The case of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania [J].
Daniels, T .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2000, 13 (03) :261-271