Prospective comparison of short and long GnRH agonist protocols using recombinant gonadotrophins for IVF/ICSI treatments

被引:24
作者
Ho, Chi-Hong [4 ]
Chen, Shee-Uan [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Fu-Shiang [3 ]
Chang, Chih-Yuan [1 ,2 ]
Lien, Yih-Ron [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yu-Shih [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Far Eastern Mem Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
IVF; long GnRH agonist protocol; short GnRH agonist protocol;
D O I
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60476-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
This is a prospective comparative study investigating cost and effectiveness of IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments after stimulation with recombinant gonadotrophins following either the short or long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol. Patients in the short protocol (n = 120) were administered buserelin nasal sprays from day 2 of the menstrual cycle and recombinant FSH from day 5. Patients in the long protocol (n = 120) were administered buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase and recombinant FSH after achieving down-regulation. The average age and basal FSH concentrations of both groups were similar. The serum LH concentrations during ovarian stimulation were significantly higher with the short protocol. The total cost of recombinant gonadotrophins (US$527 +/- 184 versus US$795 +/- 244, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the short protocol, but there was no significant difference in delivery rates (47.5 versus 36.7%) between the short and long protocols. LH flare-up during the short protocol does not seem to impair the treatment outcome. Using recombinant gonadotrophins, the short GnRH agonist protocol is an effective and cheaper choice for IVF/ICSI treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 639
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
ACHARYA U, 1992, FERTIL STERIL, V57, P815
[2]
Ovulation induction in the new millennium: Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotropin [J].
Al-Inany, H ;
Aboulghar, MA ;
Mansour, RT ;
Serour, GI .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 20 (03) :161-169
[3]
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted conception: A Cochrane Review [J].
Al-Inany, H. G. ;
Abou-Setta, A. M. ;
Aboulghar, M. .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 14 (05) :640-649
[4]
Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial [J].
Andersen, Anders Nyboe ;
Devroey, Paul ;
Arce, Joan-Carles .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (12) :3217-3227
[5]
BENRAFAEL Z, 1991, FERTIL STERIL, V55, P272
[6]
Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors:: a randomized clinical trial [J].
Bodri, D. ;
Vernaeve, V. ;
Guillen, J. J. ;
Vidal, R. ;
Figueras, F. ;
Coll, O. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (09) :2246-2251
[7]
Follicular phase serum levels of luteinizing hormone do not influence delivery rates in in vitro fertilization cycles down-regulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone [J].
Cabrera, RA ;
Stadtmauer, L ;
Mayer, JF ;
Gibbons, WE ;
Oehninger, S .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (01) :42-48
[8]
Cheon KW, 2004, J REPROD MED, V49, P733
[9]
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist use in assisted reproduction cycles: the influence of long and short regimens on pregnancy rates [J].
Cramer, DW ;
Powers, DR ;
Oskowitz, SP ;
Liberman, RF ;
Hornstein, MD ;
McShane, PM ;
Barbieri, RL .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 72 (01) :83-89
[10]
Daya S, 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14641858.CD001299, 10.1002/14651858.CD001299]