Assessing renal function from creatinine measurements in adults with chronic renal failure

被引:164
作者
Walser, M
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol & Mol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
glomerular filtration rate; creatinine; cimetidine; clearance;
D O I
10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9669420
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) following the injection of one of several suitable marker substances remains the best method to determine the severity of renal insufficiency as well as its rate of progression. However, the expense of these procedures continues to restrict their use. A second alternative is the determination of creatinine clearance (C-Cr) after oral administration of cimetidine. This drug blocks tubular secretion of creatinine almost completely, and C-Cr measured under these conditions is reported to be nearly identical to GFR in mild or severe renal failure. The optimal dose and timing of cimetidine for this purpose is still uncertain, but a single 1,200-mg dose 2 hours before beginning urine collection is probably suitable. A third alternative is simply the measurement of serum or plasma creatinine (P-Cr) concentration. However, it is well established that substantial reductions in renal function may occur before P-Cr becomes abnormal. GFR in adults with chronic renal failure can be approximately estimated from P-Cr, provided it is greater than 2 mg/dL, with the aid of additional demographic and biochemical variables. Gender, height, weight, age, and race should be taken into account. Further study is needed to derive the best formula for predicting GFR from Pc, and other variables. Finally, C-Cr (without cimetidine) is still in use. This is unfortunate because it has been established that rather than improving on the estimation of GFR from P-Cr, C-Cr (determined from urinary creatinine measurements as well as P-Cr) is a less reliable guide to GFR than P-Cr alone. The C-Cr/GFR ratio is almost always greater than unity and increases with decreasing GFR to a maximum of approximately 1.7 at a GFR of approximately 20 mL/min. Furthermore, the variability of C-Cr is greater than that of P-Cr. Measurement of C-Cr (without cimetidine) is an anachronism and should be abandoned. (C) 1998 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 31
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   ALL THAT IS EXCRETED DOES NOT GLISTER - OR WHY DO WE KEEP ON COLLECTING URINE TO MEASURE CREATININE CLEARANCE [J].
ADAM, W .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 23 (06) :638-638
[2]  
AGARWAL R, 1993, LANCET, V341, P188
[3]   RENAL HANDLING OF CREATININE IN NEPHROTIC AND NON-NEPHROTIC PATIENTS [J].
ANDERSON, CF ;
JAECKS, DM ;
BALLON, HS ;
DEPALMA, JR ;
CUTLER, RE .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1970, 38 (05) :555-&
[4]   MEASUREMENT OF GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION RATE IN HOMOZYGOUS SICKLE-CELL DISEASE - A COMPARISON OF CR-51 EDTA CLEARANCE, CREATININE CLEARANCE, SERUM CREATININE AND BETA-2 MICROGLOBULIN [J].
APARICIO, SAJ ;
MOJIMINIYI, S ;
KAY, JDS ;
SHEPSTONE, BJ ;
DECEULAER, K ;
SERJEANT, GR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1990, 43 (05) :370-372
[5]  
Baracskay D, 1997, CLIN NEPHROL, V47, P222
[6]  
BAUER JH, 1982, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V11, P30
[7]   ENDOGENOUS CREATININE CLEARANCE AS A CLINICAL MEASURE OF GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE [J].
BENNETT, WM ;
PORTER, GA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1971, 4 (5779) :84-&
[8]   DELIMITATION OF PLASMA CREATININE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR ASSESSMENT OF RELATIVE RENAL-FUNCTION IN ADULT PATIENTS [J].
BROCHNERMORTENSEN, J ;
JENSEN, S ;
RODBRO, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1977, 11 (03) :257-262
[9]   SELECTION OF ROUTINE METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION RATE IN ADULT PATIENTS [J].
BROCHNERMORTENSEN, J ;
RODBRO, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1976, 36 (01) :35-43
[10]   RELIABILITY OF ROUTINE CLEARANCE METHODS FOR ASSESSMENT OF GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION RATE IN ADVANCED RENAL-INSUFFICIENCY [J].
BROCHNERMORTENSEN, J ;
FREUND, LG .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1981, 41 (01) :91-97