The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings

被引:75
作者
Grammatopoulos, G. [1 ]
Thomas, G. E. R. [1 ]
Pandit, H. [1 ]
Beard, D. J. [1 ]
Gill, H. S. [1 ]
Murray, D. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
关键词
JOHN-CHARNLEY; DISLOCATION; REPLACEMENT; RISK; PROSTHESIS; MOTION; RANGE;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34294
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
We assessed the orientation of the acetabular component in 1070 primary total hip arthroplasties with hard-on-soft, small diameter bearings, aiming to determine the size and site of the target zone that optimises outcome. Outcome measures included complications, dislocations, revisions and Delta OHS (the difference between the Oxford Hip Scores pre-operatively and five years post-operatively). A wide scatter of orientation was observed (2SD 15 degrees). Placing the component within Lewinnek's zone was not associated withimproved outcome. Of the different zone sizes tested (+/- 5 degrees, +/- 10 degrees and +/- 15 degrees), only +/- 15 degrees was associated with a decreased rate of dislocation. The dislocation rate with acetabular components inside an inclination/anteversion zone of 40 degrees/15 degrees +/- 15 degrees was four times lower than those outside. The only zone size associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvement in OHS was +/- 5 degrees. The best outcomes (Delta OHS > 26) were achieved with a 45 degrees/25 degrees +/- 5 degrees zone. This study demonstrated that with traditional technology surgeons can only reliably achieve a target zone of +/- 15 degrees. As the optimal zone to diminish the risk of dislocation is also +/- 15 degrees, surgeons should be able to achieve this. This is the first study to demonstrate that optimal orientation of the acetabular component improves the functional outcome. However, the target zone is small (+/- 5 degrees) and cannot, with current technology, be consistently achieved.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 172
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Berry, DJ ;
Von Knoch, M ;
Schleck, CD ;
Harmsen, WS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (11) :2456-2463
[2]
Biedermann R, 2005, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V87B, P762, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6
[3]
Soft tissue balancing - The hip [J].
Bourne, RB ;
Rorabeck, CH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (04) :17-22
[4]
What is the relationship between patients' and clinicians' reports of the outcomes of elective surgery? [J].
Bream, Elizabeth ;
Black, Nick .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2009, 14 (03) :174-182
[5]
The John Charnley Award Risk Factors for Cup Malpositioning Quality Improvement Through a Joint Registry at a Tertiary Hospital [J].
Callanan, Mark C. ;
Jarrett, Bryan ;
Bragdon, Charles R. ;
Zurakowski, David ;
Rubash, Harry E. ;
Freiberg, Andrew A. ;
Malchau, Henrik .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (02) :319-329
[6]
The John Charnley Award -: A study of inplant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties [J].
Campbell, Pat ;
Beaule, Paul E. ;
Ebramzadeh, Edward ;
LeDuff, Michel ;
De Smet, Koen ;
Lu, Zhen ;
Amstutz, Harlan C. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (453) :35-46
[7]
Charles Mark N, 2005, Instr Course Lect, V54, P131
[8]
The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios [J].
D'Lima, DD ;
Urquhart, AG ;
Buehler, KO ;
Walker, RH ;
Colwell, CW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (03) :315-321
[9]
Dorr LD, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P144
[10]
FACKLER CD, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P169