How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995

被引:153
作者
Haberl, H [1 ]
Erb, KH [1 ]
Krausmann, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Austrian Univ, Inst Interdisciplinary Studies, Dept Social Ecol, A-1070 Vienna, Austria
关键词
ecological footprint; socioeconomic metabolism; biological productivity; biomass yield; overshoot; sustainability indicators;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00152-5
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In this paper we present calculations of the ecological footprint (EF) for Austria 1926-1995, based upon three different methodological approaches. Basically, EF calculations convert the use of selected materials in a country into the area needed to sustain this material Row. Therefore, biological productivity essentially determines the outcome of EF calculations, given a certain pattern of socioeconomic metabolism In most EF calculations published thus far. material and energy flows are converted to area (hectares) using global yields of the respective year. In contrast, we analyze the effect different assumptions on yields have on the results of EF calculations by assuming: (1) constant global yields as of 1995; (2) variable global yields; and (3) variable local yields for domestic extraction and variable global yields for imported biomass. Fossil-energy footprint is evaluated on the basis of constant carbon sequestration rates published by Wackernagel. According to our results different assumptions on yields can influence the result of EF calculations by a factor of 2, at least. We conclude that further research is necessary with respect to biomass yields assumed in EF calculations. The purpose for which EF calculations;Ire made, and the interpretation of their results, will determine future development of the EF methodology. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 45
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Adriaanse A., 1997, RESOURCE FLOWS MAT B
[2]  
Ayres R.U., 1994, Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development
[3]   New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy [J].
Bicknell, KB ;
Ball, RJ ;
Cullen, R ;
Bigsby, HR .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 27 (02) :149-160
[4]  
Costanza R, 2000, ECOL ECON, V32, P341
[5]  
Deutsch L, 2000, ECOL ECON, V32, P351
[6]  
Ferguson A.R.B., 1999, DEV SUSTAINABILITY, V1, P149
[7]  
Ferguson ARB, 1999, ECOL ECON, V31, P318
[8]  
Fischer-Kowalski M., 1998, J IND ECOL, V2, P61, DOI [10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61, DOI 10.1162/JIEC.1998.2.1.61]
[9]  
Fischer-Kowalski Marina, 1997, The International Handbook of Enviromental Sociology, P119
[10]  
GIAMPIETRO M, 1991, ECOLOGICAL PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, P139