Augmentation of wall shear stress inhibits neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation - Inhibition through reduction of inflammation?

被引:92
作者
Carlier, SG
van Damme, LCA
Blommerde, CP
Wentzel, JJ
van Langehove, G
Verheye, S
Kockx, MM
Knaapen, MWM
Cheng, C
Gijsen, F
Duncker, DJ
Stergiopulos, N
Slager, CJ
Serruys, PW
Krams, R
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Thoraxctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Interuniv Cardiol Inst Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Middelheim Hosp, Antwerp, Belgium
[4] HistogeneX, Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
shear stress; restenosis; stents; cells; inflammation;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.0000066914.95878.6D
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background - Low wall shear stress (WSS) increases neointimal hyperplasia (NH) in vein grafts and stents. We studied the causal relationship between WSS and NH formation in stents by locally increasing WSS with a flow divider (Anti-Restenotic Diffuser, Endoart SA) placed in the center of the stent. Methods and Results - In 9 rabbits fed a high-cholesterol diet for 2 months to induce endothelial dysfunction, 18 stents were implanted in the right and left external iliac arteries ( 1 stent per vessel). Lumen diameters were measured by quantitative angiography before and after implantation and at 4-week follow-up, at which time, macrophage accumulation and interruption of the internal elastic lamina was determined. Cross sections of stent segments within the ARED (S + ARED), outside the ARED (S[minus] ARED), and in corresponding segments of the contralateral control stent (SCTRL) were analyzed. Changes in WSS induced by the ARED placement were derived by computational fluid dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics analysis demonstrated that WSS increased from 0.38 to 0.82 N/m(2) in the S + ARED immediately after ARED placement. This augmentation of shear stress was accompanied by (1) lower mean late luminal loss by quantitative angiography ([minus] 0.23 +/- 0.22 versus [minus] 0.58 +/- 0.30 mm, P = 0.02), (2) reduction in NH (1.48 +/- 0.58, 2.46 +/- 1.25, and 2.36 +/- 1.13 mm(2), P < 0.01, respectively, for S + ARED, S[minus] ARED, and SCTRL), and ( 3) a reduced inflammation score and a reduced injury score. Increments in shear stress did not change the relationship between injury score and NH or between inflammation score and NH. Conclusions - The newly developed ARED flow divider significantly increases WSS, and this local increment in WSS is accompanied by a local reduction in NH and a local reduction in inflammation and injury. The present study is therefore the first to provide direct evidence for an important modulating role of shear stress in in-stent neointimal hyperplasia.
引用
收藏
页码:2741 / 2746
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Carter AJ, 1999, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V11, P127
[2]  
Davies PF, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V947, P7
[3]  
Davies PF, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V947, P16
[4]   LUMINAL SURFACE CONCENTRATION OF LIPOPROTEIN (LDL) AND ITS EFFECT ON THE WALL UPTAKE OF CHOLESTEROL BY CANINE CAROTID ARTERIES [J].
DENG, XY ;
MAROIS, Y ;
HOW, T ;
MERHI, Y ;
KING, M ;
GUIDOIN, R .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 21 (01) :135-145
[5]  
Gimbrone MA, 2000, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V902, P230
[6]   EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF GEOMETRIC AND DENSITOMETRIC CORONARY MEASUREMENTS ON THE NEW-GENERATION CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY ANALYSIS SYSTEM (CAAS-II) [J].
HAASE, J ;
ESCANED, J ;
VANSWIJNDREGT, EM ;
OZAKI, Y ;
GRONENSCHILD, E ;
SLAGER, CJ ;
SERRUYS, PW .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 30 (02) :104-114
[7]  
Hansson GK, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V947, P157
[8]  
Hansson GK, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V947, P165
[9]   Increasing arterial wall injury after long-term implantation of two types of stent in a porcine coronary model [J].
Hofma, SH ;
Whelan, DMC ;
van Beusekom, HMM ;
Verdouw, PD ;
van der Giessen, WJ .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1998, 19 (04) :601-609
[10]   In-stent restenosis: Contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia [J].
Kornowski, R ;
Hong, MK ;
Tio, FO ;
Bramwell, O ;
Wu, HS ;
Leon, MB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (01) :224-230