Cord blood processing with an automated and functionally closed system

被引:29
作者
Zingsem, J
Strasser, E
Weisbach, V
Zimmermann, R
Ringwald, J
Goecke, T
Beckmann, MW
Eckstein, R
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Abt Transfus Med & Hamostaseol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00398.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood processing with standard centrifugation techniques is performed in open systems and results in varying cell and volume recoveries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty umbilical cord blood donations were randomly assigned to processing either with a microprocessor-control led cell separator equipped with closed disposables or with a manual separation procedure in blood bags. The collection efficiency of nucleated cells, MNCs, RBCs, and CD34+ cells and the processing time were analyzed. RESULTS: Using the cell processor, mean collection efficiencies were 78.6 +/- 24.9 percent for nucleated cells, 77.4 +/- 27.8 percent for MNCs, 55.5 +/- 14.6 percent for RBCs, and 83.6 +/- 32.5 percent for CD34+ cells, while they were 73.1 +/- 13.2 percent for nucleated cells, 78.1 +/- 14.9 percent for MNCs, 26.0 +/- 12.2 percent for RBCs, and 77.0 +/- 17.6 percent for CD34+ cells when using the standard centrifugation technique. The processing time was about 20 minutes for automated processing and 60 to 80 minutes for the standard centrifugation technique. CONCLUSION: Using the new cell processor, the collection efficiencies for nucleated cells, MNCs, and CD34+ cells are similar to those obtained by established centrifugation techniques while the RBC reduction is less effective. The main advantages of the new systems are the closed system, the more standardized processing procedure, and a significantly shorter processing time.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 813
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   DENSITY SEPARATION OF UMBILICAL-CORD BLOOD AND RECOVERY OF HEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS - IMPLICATIONS FOR CORD-BLOOD BANKING [J].
ALMICI, C ;
CARLOSTELLA, C ;
MANGONI, L ;
GARAU, D ;
COTTAFAVI, L ;
VENTURA, A ;
ARMANETTI, M ;
WAGNER, JE ;
RIZZOLI, V .
STEM CELLS, 1995, 13 (05) :533-540
[2]   BONE-MARROW PROCESSING ON THE HAEMONETICS V-50 CELL SEPARATOR [J].
ANDERSON, NA ;
CORNISH, JM ;
GODWIN, V ;
GUNSTONE, MJ ;
OAKHILL, A ;
PAMPHILON, DH .
TRANSFUSION SCIENCE, 1990, 11 (02) :201-204
[3]  
AREMAN E M, 1991, Transfusion Medicine Reviews, V5, P214, DOI 10.1016/S0887-7963(91)70210-1
[4]   AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF HUMAN BONE-MARROW CAN RESULT IN A POPULATION OF MONONUCLEAR-CELLS CAPABLE OF ACHIEVING ENGRAFTMENT FOLLOWING TRANSPLANTATION [J].
AREMAN, EM ;
CULLIS, H ;
SPITZER, T ;
SACHER, RA .
TRANSFUSION, 1991, 31 (08) :724-730
[5]   CONTINUOUS-FLOW CELL SEPARATOR USE FOR BONE-MARROW PROCESSING [J].
BAKER, PK ;
RHODES, EGH ;
DUGUID, JKM .
TRANSFUSION SCIENCE, 1991, 12 (03) :183-187
[6]   Effects of storage temperature and time on cord blood progenitor cells [J].
Bertolini, F ;
Gibelli, N ;
Lanza, A ;
Cuomo, A ;
Cuna, GRD ;
Nelson, EJ .
TRANSFUSION, 1998, 38 (06) :615-617
[7]   Cord blood as a source of autologous RBCs for transfusion to preterm infants [J].
Eichler, H ;
Schaible, T ;
Richter, E ;
Zieger, W ;
Voller, K ;
Leveringhaus, A ;
Goldmann, SF .
TRANSFUSION, 2000, 40 (09) :1111-1117
[8]   Postpartum umbilical cord blood collection for transplantation: A comparison of three methods [J].
Elchalal, U ;
Fasouliotis, SJ ;
Shtockheim, D ;
Brautbar, C ;
Schenker, JG ;
Weinstein, D ;
Nagler, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (01) :227-232
[9]   Results of unrelated umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplant [J].
Gluckman, E ;
Rocha, V ;
Chevret, S .
TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2001, 8 (03) :146-154
[10]   Hematopoietic stem-cell transplants using umbilical-cord blood [J].
Gluckman, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (24) :1860-1861