Diagnostic criteria and adjudication process both determine published event-rates: The ACTION trial experience

被引:20
作者
Kirwan, Bridget-Anne
Lubsen, Jacobus
de Brouwer, Sophie
Danchin, Nicolas
Battler, Alexander
de Luna, Antonio Bayes
Dunselman, Peter H. J. M.
Glasser, Stephen
Koudstaal, Peter J.
Sutton, George
van Dalen, Frederik J.
Poole-Wilson, Philip A.
机构
[1] SOCAR Res, CH-1260 Nyon, Switzerland
[2] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
[4] Rabin Med Ctr, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[5] Host Sta Claret, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, Netherlands
[7] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
关键词
clinical trials; critical events committee; diagnostic classification; event-rates; diagnostic adjudication procedures;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2007.04.001
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Few trials report event-adjudication procedures in detail. Using data from the ACTION (A Coronary disease Trial Investigating Outcome with Nifedipine GITS) study, we compared the impact on event-rates of an adjudication strategy based on systematic screening of all reported serious adverse events (SAEs) with a strategy based on investigator diagnoses. The final diagnosis was always made by a critical events committee (CEC) using standard criteria. Methods: ACTION randomized 7665 patients with stable angina to either nifedipine or placebo. Pre-specified events included acute or procedural myocardial infarction (MI), refractory angina, heart failure and debilitating stroke. Clinically related SAEs including in-hospital procedures were combined into episodes independent from the investigator diagnoses entered on SAE reports. All fatal episodes and those episodes suggestive of pre-specified events were adjudicated by the CEC. Results: During follow-up, 17,081 episodes were reported in 5312 patients. The SAE descriptions ruled out the occurrence of a pre-specified event in 28%. The remaining 72% were adjudicated by the CEC and 616 cases of MI, 361 of refractory angina, 275 of heart failure and 190 of debilitating stroke were diagnosed (total=1442). Had adjudication by the CEC been limited to the 3924 episodes (2397 patients) that were fatal or for which the investigator had reported any of the diagnoses mentioned, 98 cases of MI, 35 of refractory angina, 81 of heart failure and 14 of debilitating stroke would have been missed (total=228). Conclusion: Both the diagnostic criteria used and the adjudication process determine event-rates and conclusions about treatment effects in clinical trials. Published trial reports should always state if event-adjudication was independent of the diagnoses of investigators, and if all events of interest were adjudicated or only the first one. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 729
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)
    Brown, MJ
    Palmer, CR
    Castaigne, A
    de Leeuw, PW
    Mancia, G
    Rosenthal, T
    Ruilope, LM
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) : 366 - 372
  • [2] *CTR DRUG EV RES, 1995, COD SYMB THES ADV RE
  • [3] Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and β-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension:: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study
    Hansson, L
    Hedner, T
    Lund-Johansen, P
    Kjeldsen, SE
    Lindholm, LH
    Syvertsen, JO
    Lanke, J
    de Faire, U
    Dahlöf, B
    Karlberg, BE
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) : 359 - 365
  • [4] Hansson L, 1992, Blood Press, V1, P113, DOI 10.3109/08037059209077502
  • [5] The role of the Critical Event Committee in a major cardiovascular outcome study
    Heagerty, A
    Deverly, A
    Palmer, C
    Kaplinsky, E
    Salvetti, A
    Wahlgren, NG
    Funck-Brentano, C
    [J]. BLOOD PRESSURE, 2002, 11 (06) : 339 - 344
  • [6] Lubsen J., 1998, European Heart Journal, V19, P120
  • [7] Systematic adjudication of myocardial infarction end-points in an international clinical trial
    Mahaffey, KW
    Harrington, RA
    Akkerhuis, M
    Kleiman, NS
    Berdan, LG
    Crenshaw, BS
    Tardiff, BE
    Granger, CB
    DeJong, I
    Bhapkar, M
    Widimsky, P
    Corbalon, R
    Lee, KL
    Deckers, JW
    Simoons, ML
    Topol, EJ
    Califf, RM
    [J]. CURRENT CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2001, 2 (04): : 180 - 186
  • [8] The impact of an end-point committee in a large multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial -: Results with and without the end-point committee's final decision on end-points
    Näslund, U
    Grip, L
    Fischer-Hansen, J
    Gundersen, T
    Lehto, S
    Wallentin, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1999, 20 (10) : 771 - 777
  • [9] Effect of long-acting nifedipine on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with stable angina requiring treatment (ACTION trial):: randomised controlled trial
    Poole-Wilson, PA
    Lubsen, J
    Kirwan, BA
    van Dalen, FJ
    Wagener, G
    Danchin, N
    Just, H
    Fox, KAA
    Pocock, SJ
    Clayton, TC
    Motro, M
    Parker, JD
    Bourassa, MG
    Dart, AM
    Hildebrandt, P
    Hjalmarson, Å
    Kragten, JA
    Molhoek, GP
    Otterstad, JE
    Seabra-Gomes, R
    Soler-Soler, J
    Weber, S
    [J]. LANCET, 2004, 364 (9437) : 849 - 857
  • [10] POOLEWILSON PA, 2007, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL