GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

被引：2061

作者：

Guyatt, Gordon H. ^{[1
,5
]}

Oxman, Andrew D. ^{[2
]}

Schuenemann, Holger J. ^{[1
,5
]}

Tugwell, Peter ^{[3
]}

Knottnerus, Andre ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada

[2] Norwegian Knowledge Ctr Hlth Serv, N-0130 Oslo, Norway

[3] Univ Ottawa, Ctr Global Hlth, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada

[4] Dept Gen Practice, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands

[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2011年 / 64卷 / 04期

关键词：

GRADE; Evidence quality; Strength of recommendations; Risk of bias; Health technology assessment; Clinical practice guidelines; QUALITY; STRENGTH;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The "Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" (GRADE) approach provides guidance for rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in health care. It has important implications for those summarizing evidence for systematic reviews, health technology assessment, and clinical practice guidelines. GRADE provides a systematic and transparent framework for clarifying questions, determining the outcomes of interest, summarizing the evidence that addresses a question, and moving from the evidence to a recommendation or decision. Wide dissemination and use of the GRADE approach, with endorsement from more than 50 organizations worldwide, many highly influential (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/), attests to the importance of this work. This article introduces a 20-part series providing guidance for the use of GRADE methodology that will appear in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：380 / 382

页数：3

共 8 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2008, GRADEpro. [Computer program]. Version 3.2 for Windows. Jan Brozek, Andrew Oxman, Holger Schunemann

[2] GRADE:: Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations [J].

Guyatt, Gordon H. ;

Oxman, Andrew D. ;

Kunz, Regina ;

Jaeschke, Roman ;

Helfand, Mark ;

Liberati, Alessandro ;

Vist, Gunn E. ;

Schunemann, Holger J. .

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7654) :1170-1173

[3] GRADE:: what is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? [J].

Guyatt, Gordon H. ;

Oxman, Andrew D. ;

Vist, Gunn E. ;

Kunz, Regina ;

Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;

Schunemann, Holger .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7651) :995-999B

[4] GRADE:: going from evidence to recommendations [J].

Guyatt, Gordon H. ;

Oxman, Andrew D. ;

Kunz, Regina ;

Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;

Vist, Gunn E. ;

Liberati, Alessandro ;

Schunemann, Holger J. .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7652) :1049-1051

[5] GRADE:: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [J].

Guyatt, Gordon H. ;

Oxman, Andrew D. ;

Vist, Gunn E. ;

Kunz, Regina ;

Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;

Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;

Schuenemann, Holger J. .

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7650) :924-926

[6] Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive [J].

Jaeschke, Roman ;

Guyatt, Gordon H. ;

Dellinger, Phil ;

Schunemann, Holger ;

Levy, Mitchell M. ;

Kunz, Regina ;

Norris, Susan ;

Bion, Julian .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7665) :a744

[7] GRADE:: grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies [J].

Schuenemann, Holger J. ;

Oxman, Andrew D. ;

Brozek, Jan ;

Glasziou, Paul ;

Jaeschke, Roman ;

Vist, Gunn E. ;

Williams, John W., Jr. ;

Kunz, Regina ;

Craig, Jonathan ;

Montori, Victor M. ;

Bossuyt, Patrick ;

Guyatt, Gordon H. .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7653) :1106-1110

[8]

Schunemann HBJ., 2010, GRADE HDB GRADING QU

← 1 →